Challenges on New Normal EFL Teaching and Learning Process of ICT Integration: Summative Teachers’ Perception toward Formative Assessment

Luh Ayu Rismayanti* -  Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
Luh Putu Artini -  Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
I.G.A Lokita Purnamika Utami -  Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/dpp.v12i1.9701

With the intentional goal of promoting the equality of technology literacy in the world, formative assessment acknowledged as one of alternative assessment in educational system in responses to the demands of new normal EFL teaching and learning process in which conveys potential advantages for an educational system. Formative assessment is interesting to be exposed cause it offers the use of assessment for learning as the guidance to find out as much as the learners do during the learning process. The perception of teachers toward the application of formative assessment is interesting to be exposed cause it offers challenges during the new normal EFL teaching and learning process. This writing attempted at describing summative teachers’ perception on the implementation of formative assessment which promotes differentiated instruction   opportunities   for   helping   students’   movement.   A qualitative approach with case study research design were carried out to seek out the writing’s objective. The preliminary data was attained through observation and the primary data was attained through interviews gathered from the summative teachers’ perception toward formative assessment practices. Results reveals positive perception toward the formative assessment practices during EFL teaching and learning process.
Keywords
Perception, EFL Teaching and Learning, Formative Assessment, Summative Assessment, ICT.
  1. Ahmed, F., Ali, S., & Shah, R. A. (2019). Exploring variation in summative assessment: Language teachers’ knowledge of students’ formative assessment and its effect on their summative assessment. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 109–119. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1229441
  2. Alotaibi, K. A. (2018). Teachers’ Perceptions on Factors Influence Adoption of Formative Assessment. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n1p74
  3. Alsubaiai, H. S. M. (2021). Teachers’ Perception towards Formative Assessment in Saudi Universities’ Context: A Review of Literature. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 107. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p107
  4. Costa Akoyt, M. (2024). Formative assessment in Timor-Leste: teachers’ perception and practice. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 3(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v3i1.7243
  5. Dayal, H. C. (2021). How Teachers Use Formative Assessment Strategies During Teaching: Evidence from the Classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n7.1
  6. Diarsini, M. S., Artini, L. P., Padmadewi, N. N., Ratminingsih, N. M., Utami, I. G. A. L. P., & Marsakawati, N. P. E. (2022). Challenges and Opportunities of Online Assessment Implementation During Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia Based on Recent Studies. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(6), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.6.421
  7. Florensio Wijaya, K. (2023). Indonesian University EFL Learners’ Perspectives toward Self-Assessment in Writing Processes. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature, and Culture, 8(1), 2023. https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v8i1.2605
  8. Gillanders, C., Iruka, I. U., Bagwell, C., & Adejumo, T. (2021). Parents’ Perceptions of a K-3 Formative Assessment. School Community Journal, 31(2), 239–266. http://www.schoolcommunitynetwork.org/SCJ.aspx
  9. Govender, P. (2020). Insights into grade 2 teachers’ enactment of formative assessment in mathematics in selected priority schools in Gauteng. South African Journal of Education, 40(December), S1–S10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40ns2a1780
  10. İlhan, D., & Aydın, H. (2015). Perceptions of Higher Education Faculty Members on Bilingual Education in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(3), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i3.694
  11. Karaman, P. (2021). The Effect of Formative Assessment Practices on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(4), 801–817. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.870300
  12. Koksalan, S., & Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2024). Examination of Effects of Embedding Formative Assessment in Inquiry-Based Teaching on Conceptual Learning. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 20(2), 3223–3246. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.24.or512
  13. Krishnan, J., Black, R. W., & Olson, C. B. (2021). The Power of Context: Exploring Teachers’ Formative Assessment for Online Collaborative Writing. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 37(3), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1764888
  14. Kültür, Y. Z., & Kutlu, M. O. (2021). The effect of formative assessment on high school students’ mathematics achievement and attitudes. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021474302
  15. Labonté, C., & Smith, V. R. (2022). Learning through technology in middle school classrooms: Students’ perceptions of their self-directed and collaborative learning with and without technology. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6317–6332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10885-6
  16. Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Learning Strategies in Self-directed Language Learning Using Mobile Technology in Higher Education: A Systematic Scoping Review. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 27, Issue 6). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10945-5
  17. Lemmetty, S. (2021). Employee opportunities for self-directed learning at technology organisations: features and frames of self-directed learning projects. Studies in Continuing Education, 43(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1765758
  18. Menggo, S., & Gunas, T. (2022). College Student’s Perception of Performance-Based Assessment Use in Boosting Speaking Ability. International Journal of Language Education, 6(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i4.22910
  19. MOHAMAD HANEFAR, S. B., ANNY, N., & RAHMAN, S. (2022). Enhancing teaching and learning in higher education through formative assessment: Teachers’ Perceptions. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.946517
  20. Mohamad Nasri, N., Nasri, N., & Abd Talib, M. A. (2022). The unsung role of assessment and feedback in self-directed learning (SDL). Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1900552
  21. Mohamadi Zenouzagh, Z. (2019). The effect of online summative and formative teacher assessment on teacher competences. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9566-1
  22. Muho, A., & Taraj, G. (2022). Impact of Formative Assessment Practices on Student Motivation for Learning the English Language. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i1.2842
  23. Ozan, C., & Kıncal, R. Y. (2018). The effects of formative assessment on academic achievement, attitudes toward the lesson, and self-regulation skills. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 18(1), 85–118. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0216
  24. Padmadewi, N. N., Artini, L. P., Ratminingsih, N. M., Utami, I. G. A. L. P., & Marsakawati, N. P. E. (2022). Needs Analysis of Literacy Assessment Using Blended Learning for Beginner EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.27
  25. Pan, Y.-C. (2020). Taiwan University Students’ Perceptions of Summative and Formative Classroom Assessment in English Courses. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 46–64.
  26. Phongsirikul, M. (2018). Traditional and Alternative Assessments in ELT: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions. REFLections, 25(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v25i1.136267
  27. Rezagah, K. (2022). Iranian EFL Teachers’ Assessment Literacy Knowledge: The Impact of the Educational System on Teachers’ Classroom Assessment Practices. International Journal of Language Testing, 12(2), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJLT.2022.157126
  28. Schweder, S., & Raufelder, D. (2022). Examining positive emotions, autonomy support and learning strategies: Self-directed versus teacher-directed learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09378-7
  29. Turysbayeva, A., Zhumabayeva, A., Yessenova, K., Bainazarova, T., & Maigeldiyeva, S. (2023). The impact of formative assessment techniques on students’ self-assessment skills. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(4), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i4.5045
  30. Ullah, S., & Hossain, M. (2022). Challenges of Online English Literature Learning and Assessment in Private Universities of Bangladesh during Covid-19 Pandemic : Students ’ Perspectives. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 13(2005).
  31. Wijaya, K. F. (2022). Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions on Formative Assessment in Writing. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 8(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3359
  32. Yang, X. (2023). Implementation of Informal Formative Assessment in An Elementary Math Classroom: A Case Study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 16(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2024.326
  33. Yilmaz, G., & Bulunuz, M. (2019). Evaluating the Effect of Formative Assessment Based Learning on Students’ Understanding Regarding Basic Astronomical Concepts. European Journal of Education Studies, 0(0), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3374852
  34. Zaim, M., Refnaldi, & Arsyad, S. (2020). Authentic assessment for speaking skills: Problem and solution for english secondary school teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13340a

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2024-06-26
Published: 2024-07-03
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: