The assistance of QuillBot in powering academic writing for higher students: Systematic literature review

Authors

  • Luh Rista Hardiantini Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Ni Made Ratminingsih Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Gusti Ayu Lokita Purnamika Utami Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Made Hery Santosa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v13i2.11074

Abstract

QuillBot is a tool that influences the writing quality among higher students. This tool offers beneficial features that assist the development of academic writing ability among students. Therefore, this study aims to explore the assistance of QuillBot in academic writing among higher students. The researcher adopted the SLR (Systematic Literature Review) methodology proposed by Lame and Guillaume (2019). This method employs eight steps, from developing research questions to resulting interpretations. Those steps are conducted to determine whether the previous articles are appropriate and eligible. Ten articles were found that required the inclusion of the criteria. The articles were found in reputable resources such as Google Scholar, ResearchGate, ScienceDirect, and Taylor & Francis. The findings revealed that QuillBot assists the students in creating minimum errors in writing by discovering grammatical errors, paraphrasing sentences for writing evaluation, avoiding plagiarism, and encouraging students’ motivation. Overall, the tool facilitates the students’ development of their academic writing ability. Additionally, the students’ positive perceptions of writing development support it. They showed language improvement, such as vocabulary development and grammatical ability. Therefore, QuillBot assists the students in powering their writing ability and minimizing their anxiety toward academic writing.

References

Amanda, Sukma, E. M, Lubis, N., & Dewi, U. (2023). Quillbot as an ai-powered english writing assistant: An alternative for students to write English. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sastra Inggris, 3(2), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v3i2.2026
Astuti, D., & Sumarni, S. (2023). Grammarly in students’ self-directed learning for writing skills: Advantages and disadvantages. INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 28(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v28i1a.8899
Bareq Raad Raheem, Farheen Anjum, & Zanyar Nathir Ghafar. (2023). Exploring the profound impact of artificial intelligence applications (Quillbot, Grammarly and ChatGPT) on English academic writing: A systematic review. International Journal of Integrative Research (IJIR), 1(10), 599–622. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijir.v1i10.366
Chanpradit, T., Samran, P., Saengpinit, S., & Subkasin, P. (2024). English paraphrasing strategies and levels of proficiency of an ai-generated quillbot and paraphrasing tool: Case study of scientific research abstracts. Journal of English Teaching, 10(2), 110–126. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt
Chauhan, P. (2022). Fundamentals of academic writing: A literature review. Journal of NELTA, 27(1), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v27i1-2.53201
Dewi, U., Hasanah, N., Julaika, S., Carmelia, E., & Sambas, M. (2024). Using Quillbot paraphraser in EFL writing : The effectiveness from students ’ perceptions. English Journal for Teaching and Learning 12(01), 28–41.
Faisal, F., & Carabella, P. A. (2023). Utilizing grammarly in an academic writing process: higher-education students’ perceived views. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1006
Fitria, T. N. (2021). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1), 183. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233
Fitria, T. N. (2022). Avoiding plagiarism of students’ scientific writing by using the Quillbot paraphraser. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 4(3), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i3.9917
French, A. (2018). ‘Fail better’: Reconsidering the role of struggle and failure in academic writing development in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1251848
French, A. (2020). Academic writing as identity-work in higher education: forming a ‘professional writing in higher education habitus.’ Studies in Higher Education, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(8), 1605–1617. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1572735
Gürbüz, N. (2024). The impact of quillbot as an automated writing evaluation tool on EFL learners. Journal of Educational Studies and Multidisciplinary Approaches, 4(2), 101–120
Hadiat, A. W. F. (2022). the use of Grammarly to enhance students’ accuracy in writing descriptive text. Journal of English Education Program (JEEP), 9(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v9i2.8552
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A meta-analysis. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
Jaladara, A. R., Jafar, M. B., & Salija, K. (2023). Quillbot web-application: utilizing online technology on academic writing at an Indonesian Islamic Higher Education. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 3(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.51629/cjls.v3i2.152
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5(March), 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145
Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of quillbot utilization in English academic writing class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852
Lame, & Guillaume. (2019). Systematic literature reviews: An introduction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 2019-Augus (July), 1633–1642. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.169
Latifah, S., Muth’im, A., & Nasrullah, N. (2024). The use of quillbot in academic writing. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 7(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v7i1.4047
Maharani, R., Hakiki, S. S., & Safitri, S. (2023). Students’ problems in writing academic article: A case study in academic writing class. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 16(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v16i2.17434
Nawi, M. N. S., & Muhmad Nor, N. A. A. (2023). The challenges in the teaching of English literature. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 6(1), 130-147. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v6i1.2640
Nhu, P. N. Q. (2024). The perspectives of post-graduates majoring in english regarding the usage of quillbot to enhance paraphrasing skills. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 1(1), 29–140. https://doi.org/10.51383/jesma.2024.101
Nurmayanti, N., & Suryadi, S. (2023). The effectiveness of using quillbot in improving writing for students of English education study program. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v8i1.6392
Pineteh, E. A. (2014). The academic writing challenges of undergraduate students: A South African case study. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n1p12
Syahnaz, M., & Fithriani, R. (2023). Utilizing artificial intelligence-based paraphrasing tool in efl writing class: A focus on Indonesian university students’ perceptions. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i2.14882
Wiranda, A., Dewi, U., Harahap, B. Q., & Alqawwiy, T. A. (2024). The students’ difficulties in writing research article. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning (JELTL), 5(1), 34–47. http://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/english-language-teaching/index
Yoandita, & Yenni Hasnah. (2024). Quillbot as an alternative writing tool: Examining its uses on the academic writing performance of Efl Learners. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 7(2), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i2.15254

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

Issue

Section

Artikel