Peningkatan Kapasitas Manusia Sebagai Fokus dari People Centered Development

Penulis

  • Purwowibowo Purwowibowo Universitas Jember
  • Kris Hendrijanto Universitas Jember
  • Pra Adi Soelistijono Universitas Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v6i2.1068

Abstrak

This article discusses the development paradigm that focuses on human  or people centered development. Many development paradigms have been applied in many developing countries, but the results have not been satisfactory. During this time the various paradigms emphasize economic growth, equity of development, and others, but the distortion of development appears everywhere. For example, development by emphasizes economic-growth was followed by massive environmental damage. In addition, poverty is still a portrait of people in developing countries, although the country is experiencing high economic growth. In realizing a prosperous society free of poverty, a new strategy or development paradigm that emphasizes its human factors are needed. In this case, this paradigm discusses the importance of the human element as the 'core' of development itself. If human beings are capable, have sufficient knowledge, adequate skills by themselves poverty will be reduced. Therefore, this paradigm more implies that is a 'capacity building ' of human beings so that it can become the subject of development and not just as an object of development themselves. Capacity building can be achieved through social development that emphasizes elements of education, knowledge, and skills so that they can try or do entrepreneurship and open their own job opportunities. Many cases, various development paradigms that emphasize economic growth are not able to absorb the available labor so that many are unemployed. With the ability of human or people, they have will be able to open their own business and do not depend on the provision of employment from the government. In the end they are able to alleviate self-poverty.

Biografi Penulis

Purwowibowo Purwowibowo, Universitas Jember

Program Studi Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial

Kris Hendrijanto, Universitas Jember

Program Studi Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial

Pra Adi Soelistijono, Universitas Jember

Program Studi Ilmu Hubungan Internasional

Referensi

Aghion, P. and Patrick Bolton (1997). A Theory of Economic Studies. Vol. 64, Issue 2. April.

Mardzuki, K. et al. (2014) Intersectoral Linkages in Malaysian Agricultural Industry: Identification of Key and Non Key Sector for Growth Promotion. Proceeding ITMAR. Vol. 1, 437-447

McGinty, S. (2002). Community Capacity Building. ERIC – Search Education Resources.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED473884

McClelland, D.C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Free Press, New York.

Midgley, J. (1995). Social Development : The Development Perspective in Social Welfare (pp. 1- 36) London: Sage Publication.

Mulyadi, M. (2017). Peran Pemerintah Dalam Mengatasi Pengangguran dan Kemiskinan Masyarakat. Kajian. Vol.21. No. 2 hal 221-236.

Oliver, M. (1996).Understanding disability: From theory to practice. American Psychological Association. 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6

Pearce, D. W (1983). The Dictionary of Modern Economic. MacMillan Press. London.

Pearson, C. M. And Judith A. Clair (1998). Reframing Crisis Management. Academic Management Review. Vol. 23. No. 1.

Sumawinta, S. (2004). Politik Ekonomi Kerakyatan. Penerbit: PT Gramedia Utama Pustaka Utama Jakarta.

United Nation Organization. (2000). World Development Goals. United Nation Program. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sdgoverview/mdg_goals.html

United Nation Organization. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. United Nation Program. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/sustainabledevelopmentgoals

Wong, C-Y and Fung, H-N (2017).‘Science-technology-industry correlative indicators for policy targeting on emerging technologies: exploring the core competencies and promising industries of aspirant economies’. Scientometrics.Vol. 111:841–867.

Terbitan

Bagian

Artikel