Penataan Struktur dan Kewenangan Komisi Pemilihan Umum, Badan Pengawas Pemilu dan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Pemilihan Umum yang Demokratis di Indonesia

Sri Warjiyati* -  UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v8i1.1874

The General election or in other terms called Election is an absolute requirement to carry out people's sovereignty for a democratic country and to establish itself as a democratic state. An election is used to be democratic or not, depends by the existence of an election organizing body or institution. In order to realize quality and capacity elections, professional electoral institutions are also needed. However, this will be difficult to realize if the electoral institutions itselves, between the General Election Commission (KPU), the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) and the Election Administrators Honorary Council (DKPP) are having differences in opinion continually. This difference in opinion occurs because of the lack of clarity regarding the mechanism of organizing the election in the general election organs,  so that the regulation must be corrected and explicitly clarified about the authority and responsibility of each general election organs. This research uses normative laws by the laws the election approach. The purpose of this research as a critic between KPU, Bawaslu and DKPP to carry out their authority by clarifying the mecanism of election management. With the explanation above, the author concludes that, between the KPU, Bawaslu and DKPP have to clarify their respective authority and responsibilities, so it isn’t to be a cause in differences opinion which would result in undemocratic elections.

Keywords
Structuralization; Authority; KPU; Bawaslu; DKPP; Harmonious Relations; Election;
  1. Abdullah, R. (2009). Mewujudkan Pemilu Yang Lebih Berkualitas. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  2. Budiman, A. (2018). Strategi Mewujudkan Pemilu yang Berkualitas dan Berintegritas. Jember: Universitas Jember.
  3. Gaffar, J. M. (2012). Demokrasi Konstitusional Praktik Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
  4. Hadjon, P. M. (2009). Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  5. Huda, N., & Nasef, M. I. (2017). Penataan Demokrasi dan Pemilu di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Kencana.
  6. Ibrahim, J. (2010). Teori & Metodologi Penetitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
  7. Jimly, A.-S. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
  8. Liani, L. (2016). Desain Hubungan Kelembagaan Penyelenggara Pemilu. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 1(1).
  9. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 11/PUU-VIII/2010 tentang Pengujian Undang- Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2007 tentang Penyelenggara Pemilu (2007).
  10. Sarwono, B. (2014). Pengawasan Pemilu Problem dan Tantangan. Yogyakarta: Bawaslu Provinsi DIY. Yogyakarta.
  11. Soemitro, R. H. (1983). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
  12. Supriyanto, D. (2007). Menjaga Independensi Penyelenggara Pemilu. Semarang: Badan Pelaksana Perludem.
  13. Surbakti, R., & Nugroho, K. (2015). Studi tentang Desain Kelembagaan Pemilu yang Efeketif. Jakarta: Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2019-08-06
Published: 2020-01-01
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: 185 197
Citation :