MUTU PENDIDIKAN PADA PERGURUAN TINGGI KEAGAMAA: Dari Manajemen Kelembagaan Hingga Konstruksi Kurikulum Interrelasi

Dakir Elbadiansyah* -  IAIN Palangkaraya, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/muaddib.v7i01.550

The development of the quality of religious universities in general is still left behind. One of the causes, construction of the foundation of quality in religious colleges is still partial. This article attempts to identify the quality of general religious college education in Indonesia through critical analysis and offers alternative solutions to improve it. One of the right models to improve the quality of education is the global quality assurance model. This model is an integration of PD Dikti quality standards, quality standards of National Accreditation Board, internal quality audit, Webometric, and religious institutions distingsi standards. As for improving the quality of education and learning of lecturers and students are able to produce learning products in the form of books and scientific articles published in national and international scientific journals as well as increasing the competence of graduates. Therefore the aspects of ontology, epistemology and axiology in the integration of science in the curriculum of education need to be constructed with critical interrelation model. This model is relatively effective enough to anticipate the occurrence of pseudo interconnects, preventing hybridity and new hegemonic scholarship in the pattern of interconnectivity and protect the characteristics of every science.
Keywords
Quality of Education, Curriculum, and Islamic Higher Education
  1. Abdullah, M. Amin “ Pengajaran Kalam dan Teologi di Era Kemajemukan: Sebuah Tinjauan Materi dan Metode Pendidikan Agama”, dalam Tashwirul Afkar, Jurnal Refleksi Pemikiran Keagamaan dan Kebudayaan, Edisi No. 11, 2001.
  2. Ahmad, Yusuf al-Hajj, (1993) The Islamic Phyloshopy dalam Mohamad Anas, Filsafat Ilmu Keislaman: Sebuah Interrelasi Kritis, Jakarta: Grafindo Khazanah Ilmu, 2008.
  3. Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional, Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Perguruan Tinggi, Jakarta: 2010
  4. Higher Education Long Term Strategy (HELTS) 2010
  5. Husni Thoyyar, Dikotomi Ilmu dan Problematika Umat Islam, Bandung: Mizan, 2010
  6. --------------, Integrasi Ilmu: Membangun Kerangka Filsafat Keilmuan Islam, Jakarta, Gema Insani Press, 2010.
  7. Morton, Robert S, David, (2008) The Execution Premium :Lingking Strategy to Educational Quality Assurance And Knowledges Operations for Competitive Anvantage. USA: Harvard Bussiness School. 2008 dalam Kamaruzzaman, Tantangan Pendidikan di Era Globalisasi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013.
  8. Kearney, Meek dan Salazar-Clemena, Quality, Competition, Cooperation, and Change in Academic Profession, terj. M. Badruzzaman.Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana, 2007.
  9. Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 47 Tahun 2015 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi
  10. Lee Ying, Pendidikan di Era Globalisasi, 2001.
  11. Nizam, Muhammad, Tantangan Pendidikan di Era Globalisasi, Bandung : Remaja Rodakarya, 2006.
  12. Nurman Said, Mohammad dkk, Dikotomi Ilmu Pengetahuan :Sebuah Wacana Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan, Jakarta: Kanisius, 2005.
  13. Rinna dan Koivula, Globalisasi Pendidikan,Pengetahuan dan Peradaban Manusia, Jakarta: Grafindo, 2005.
  14. Thomas. S. Kuhn (1970) The Phyloshophy of Science dalam Suriasumantri, Filsafat Ilmu, Jakarta:Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2009.
  15. Unesco, dalam "World Declaration on Higher Education for the Twenty-First Century Vision and Action", 2000.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2017-07-04
Published: 2017-07-04
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: