DEVELOPING MODELAUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Aditia Eska Wardana* -  Muhammadiyah University of Sukabumi, Indonesia
Iis Nurasih -  Muhammadiyah University of Sukabumi, Indonesia
Luthfi Hamdani Maula -  Muhammadiyah University of Sukabumi, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/jin.v3i3.1431

The purpose of this study is to: (1) analyze the factual model conditions, (2) designing a model of authentic assessment, (3) determine the validity of the model of authentic assessment and (4) assessing the practical of the final model of authentic assessment of learning process in elementary school of Margasari, Tegal. The method used is the Research and Development (R & D), which consists of the preliminary study stage, stage of development and evaluation phase. Respondents are teachers. The model is validated by experts and practitioners with Delphi technique. Quantitative descriptive technique is applied to test Practicality of model that measures the ease aspects of the use models and benefits by giving questionnaires to the respondents to the teachers as users of the product. The results showed that: (1) the factual model condition of authentic assessment is still prioritizing aspects of knowledge as the basis of assessment, (2) the design of assessment model used authentic assessment based on the planning, implementation, and processing, (3) the validity of the authentic assessment model consists of validity learning device and assessment instruments. The validity of the learning device has a validity rate of 76.25% (good), while the validity of assessment instruments have a validity rate of 86% (excellent) and (4) practical authentic assessment models used in the assessment of Elementary School seen from the response of good teachers amounted to 89.8% (very practical). 

Keywords
authentic assessment, elementaryschool, 2013 curriculum
  1. Abidin, Yunus. 2014. Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
  2. Aditia, Wardana Eska. 2017 “Pengembangan Model Penilaian Autentik pada Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Tegal”. Tesis. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang. (tidak dipublikasikan).
  3. Arifin, Zaenal. 2016. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  4. Bagnato, S.J. 2007. Authentic Assesment for Early Childhood Intervention: Best Practices. New York: The Guildford Press.
  5. Basuki Ismet & Harianto. 2014. Assesment Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  6. Borg & Gall. 1983. Educational Research, An Introduction. New York and London: Longman Inc.
  7. Brianne E.J, Komedian. 2008 “ Peningkatan Kinerja Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA melalui Authentic Assesment di SD 54 Manado”. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. (tidak dipublikasikan).
  8. Fuadi, Totok Sumaryanto, & Wahyu Lestari. 2015. “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Psikomotor Pembelajaran IPA Materi Tumbuhan Hijau Berbasis Starter Experiment Approach Berwawasan Konservasi”. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 4 (2): 91-100.
  9. Kokom Komalasari. 2013.
  10. Pembelajaran Kontekstual: Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
  11. Kunandar. 2014. Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Siswa Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013): Suatu Pendekatan Praktis disertai dengan Contoh. Ed. Rev. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  12. Masrukan. 2013. Asesmen Otentik Pembelajaran Matematika. Semarang: Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA) Universitas Negeri Semarang.
  13. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. 2007. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.
  14. Peratutan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
  15. Peratutan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
  16. Permendikbud Nomor 104 tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Guru pada Pendidikan Dasar danPendidikan Menengah. 2014. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
  17. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitataif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  18. Suharsimi, A. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  19. Utari. 2010. “Penilaian Autentik Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kurikulum 2013 Guru Kelas IV”. Wahana,5(1).

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2018-12-28
Published: 2018-12-28
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: