Accountability Model for Utilization of Privilege Funds Special Region of Yogyakarta 2013-2017

Sakir Sakir* -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Riska Sarofah -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v8i2.2481

This study describes the process of accountability of DIY special funds in realizing the prosperity of DIY society 2013-2017. Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the regions that get the special policy in the form of asymmetric decentralization. This policy is effective since the enactment of Law Number 13 the Year 2012 on the Specialties of DIY. In particular, this regulation regulates 5 privileged affairs: the procedures for filling the positions, positions, duties and authorities of the Governor and Vice Governor, the regional government of DIY, the affairs of culture, the land affairs and spatial affairs. The hope that decentralization policy in Indonesia can improve the people's welfare significantly has not been fulfilled. This is like what happened in Yogyakarta Special Region which has special authority to manage its government affairs. However, these expectations still cannot be met well. This study aims to analyze the accountability model for the utilization of DIY privileged funds so as to provide policy recommendations to be taken. This research uses the qualitative method with data collection method with in-depth interview technique, elite interview, and documentation. The results showed that the poverty rate in DIY until March 2017 about 488.53 thousand people or about 13.02% and Ratio Gini DIY by 0.425%. This is not worth the number of privileged funds that increase each year. It is, therefore, necessary in the determination of success indicators of achievement and output in accordance with the output and outcome to be achieved. In addition, the accountability process also includes not only technical in report submission but also ensuring that process and involving the community in the planning process until accountability.
Keywords
Accountability; Privilege Funds; Special Region of Yogyakarta;
  1. Ahmadi, Nugroho, Dahuri. 2012. “’Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Capital Disloussure.” Accounting Analysis Journal 1 (2).
  2. Anthony, and Govindanrajan. 2005. Management Control System. Edisi Pert. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  3. Astuty, E., and Fanida, E. H. 2013. “Akuntabilitas Pemerintah Desa Dalam Pengelolaan Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Desa (APBDES) (Studi Pada Alokasi Dana Desa Tahun Anggaran 2011 Di Desa Sareng Kecamatan Geger Kabupaten Madiun).” Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
  4. Bismar Haris Satriawan, and Dyah Mutiarin. 2017. “Analisis Kebijakan Anggaran Dana Keistimewaan Dalam Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat DIY.”
  5. Denzin, and Lincoln. 1997. Hand Book of Qualitative Research. Thousand oaks, London.: Sage Publication.
  6. Dowdle, Michael W. 2017. Public Accountability: Conceptual, Historical and Epistemic Mappings. Edited by PETER DRAHOS. ANU Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1q1crtm.20?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  7. Emzir. 2012. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Bandung: Rajagrafindo Persada.
  8. Kompas. 2017. “No Title.” 16 Maret 2017, 2017.
  9. Kurniadi, Bayu Dardias. 2012. “DESENTRALISASI ASIMETRIS DI INDONESIA.” Http://Bdardias.Staff.Ugm.Ac.Id/Wp-Content/Uploads/2008/06/Desentralisasi-Asimetris-Di-Indonesia-LAN-Bdg-26112012.Pdf.
  10. Kusuma, Hendra. 2013. “Desentralisasi Fiskal Dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Indonesia,” 1–11.
  11. Mandasari, Zayati. 2014. Desentralisasi Asimetris Dalam NKRI (Kajian Terhadap Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Dan Surakarta). Yogyakarta: UII Yogyakarta.
  12. Moleong, Lexy. 2009. Qualitative Research. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda karya Offset.
  13. Mutiarin, Dyah. 2012. “Dinamika Kebijakan Anggaran Publik: Konfigurasi Dan Dampak Terhadap Pembangunan Di Daerah.” In Makalah Disampaikan Pada Orasi Ilmiah Di Universitas Tridharma Balikpapan.
  14. Pratama, Andhika Yudha. 2015a. “Pelaksanaan Desentralisasi Asimetris Dalam Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Daerah Di Era Demokrasi.” Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan Th. 28 (1).
  15. ———. 2015b. “Pelaksanaan Desentralisasi Asimetris Dalam Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Daerah Di Era Demokrasi.” Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan Volume 10: 6–7.
  16. Riyanto. 2017. “Akuntabilitas Finansial Dalam Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa (ADD) Di Kantor Desa Perangat Selatan Kecamatan Marangkayu Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara.” Samarinda: Universitas Mulawarman.
  17. Sakir, and Dyah Mutiarin. 2015. “Kebijakan Anggaran Dana Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.” Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 2 (3). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18196/ jgpp.2014.0040.
  18. Salim, Agus. 2006. Teori Dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Taira Wacana.
  19. Suparno, Dian Putri Pratama, Retno. 2013. “Kajian Tentang Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2012 Tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Yogyakarta.” DIPONEGORO LAW REVIEW Volume 1, Nomor 2, Tahun 2013 1 (37): 1–11. https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/18884/kajian-tentang-politik-hukum-undang-undang-nomor-13-tahun-2012-tentang-keistimew.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2020-02-29
Published: 2020-06-01
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: