Analysis of Sidampak Service Innovation as Glocalization of E-government In Wukirsari Village, Sleman Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v8i2.2458Abstract
The Population Data Utilization System (Sidampak) in Wukirsari Village, Sleman Regency is a population administration service program that has provided many benefits. The background lacks clear planning in developing services to the community and a low level of community participation in the administration of population documents which then becomes the basis for creating a population administration service system that can provide complete, accurate, fast, easy and integrated results. This then led to a commitment for the village government of Wukirsari in making public service innovations. This innovation is not only the value of fast, easy, inexpensive, but more on the value of services that can be adapted to the culture of the Wukirsari community. Related, this study found that there are public services that consist of the Population Data Utilization System (Sidampak) program in Wukirsari Village which can then change service policies to better suit the social conditions of the community. Meanwhile, the research method used by researchers is a qualitative descriptive research method
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Arfani, R. N. (2004). Globalisasi: Karakteristik & Implikasinya. Journal Al-Manär, (April 2003), 1–13.
Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector : Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001
Bijl-brouwer, M. Van Der. (2019). Problem Framing Expertise in Public and Social Innovation. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.003
Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply : The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. 45, 414–426.
Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (1995). Global Modernities (Roy Boyne, M. Hepworth, S. Lash, R. Robertson, & B. S. Turner, eds.). London: SAGE Publication s.
Giulianotti, R., & Robertson, R. (2007). Forms of glocalization : globalization and the migration strategies of Scottish football fans in North America. Loughborough University Institutional Repository, 41(1).
Indonesia, M. P. A. N. dan R. B. R. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi REPUBLIK INDONESIA Nomor 17 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Penilaian Kinerja Unit Penyelenggara Pelayanan Publik.
Indrajit, R. E. (2016). Konsep Dan Strategi Electronic Government.
Informasi, M. K. dan. (2003). Kebijakan Dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan e-Government: Panduan Penyusunan Rencana Induk Pengembangan E-Government Lembaga. Jakarta.
Lenihan, H., Mcguirk, H., & Murphy, K. R. (2019). Driving innovation : Public policy and human capital. Research Policy, (October 2017), 103791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.015
Matei, A., & Bujac, R. (2016). Innovation and Public Reform. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39(November 2015), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30278-7
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Pastuh, D. (2015). Book Review - Global Themes and Local Variations in Organization and Management – Perspectives on Glocalization, Gili S. Drori, Markus A. Höllerer, Peter Walgenbach (Eds.), Routledge, New York/London, 2014 xv+432 pp., 78,95$ (paperback), ISBN: 978-0-415-8. Journal of International Management, 21, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2014.11.001
Petros, S., Johnson, M., & Enquist, B. (2016). Service Innovation in a Complex Service System : Public Transit Service Sustainability Business Cases. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224(August 2015), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.459
Ritzer, G. (1983). The McDonaldization of Society. Journal of American Culture, 6(1), 371–379.
Ritzer, G. (2003). The Globalization of Nothing. SAIS Review, XXIII(2), 189–200.
Rivera, J. D., & Landahl, M. R. (2019). An environment conducive to bureaucratic innovation ?: Exploring the potential for public entrepreneurship within FEMA. Journal of Urban Management, (March), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.001
Scupola, A., & Zanfei, A. (2016). Governance and innovation in public sector services : The case of the digital library ☆. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.005
Shareef, M. A., Raman, R., Baabdullah, A. M., Mahmud, R., Uddin, J., Kabir, H., … Mukerji, B. (2019). International Journal of Information Management Public service reformation : Relationship building by mobile technology. International Journal of Information Management, 49(March), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.007
Sigismondi, P. (2011). The Economics of Information , Communication , and Entertainment The Impacts of Digital Technology in the 21st Century (D. Gerbarg, ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Sobari, W. (2019). Menulis Proposal Inovasi Pelayanan Publik. Malang.
Sousa, M. D. M., Soares, R., Najberg, E., & Medeiros, J. J. (2015). Portraying innovation in the public service of Brazil: Frameworks, systematization and characterization. Revista de Administração, 50(4), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1213
Stoshikj, M., Kryvinska, N., & Strauss, C. (2016). Service Systems and Service Innovation : two pillars of Service Science. Procedia - Procedia Computer Science, 83(Ant), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.118
Torregrosa-hetland, S., Pelkonen, A., Oksanen, J., & Kander, A. (2019). The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations – A comparison of Finland. Research Policy, (December 2018), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001
Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Sepulveda, L., & Mcmullin, C. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics : The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy, 46(10), 1755–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.003
Weber, K. M., Heller-schuh, B., & Godoe, H. (2014). ICT-enabled system innovations in public services : Experiences from intelligent transport systems. Telecommunications Policy, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.12.004
Winarno, B. (2008). Globalisasi dan Masa Depan Demokrasi. Global & Strategis, 3(2), 123–141.
Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector : Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001
Bijl-brouwer, M. Van Der. (2019). Problem Framing Expertise in Public and Social Innovation. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.003
Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply : The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. 45, 414–426.
Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (1995). Global Modernities (Roy Boyne, M. Hepworth, S. Lash, R. Robertson, & B. S. Turner, eds.). London: SAGE Publication s.
Giulianotti, R., & Robertson, R. (2007). Forms of glocalization : globalization and the migration strategies of Scottish football fans in North America. Loughborough University Institutional Repository, 41(1).
Indonesia, M. P. A. N. dan R. B. R. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi REPUBLIK INDONESIA Nomor 17 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pedoman Penilaian Kinerja Unit Penyelenggara Pelayanan Publik.
Indrajit, R. E. (2016). Konsep Dan Strategi Electronic Government.
Informasi, M. K. dan. (2003). Kebijakan Dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan e-Government: Panduan Penyusunan Rencana Induk Pengembangan E-Government Lembaga. Jakarta.
Lenihan, H., Mcguirk, H., & Murphy, K. R. (2019). Driving innovation : Public policy and human capital. Research Policy, (October 2017), 103791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.015
Matei, A., & Bujac, R. (2016). Innovation and Public Reform. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39(November 2015), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30278-7
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Pastuh, D. (2015). Book Review - Global Themes and Local Variations in Organization and Management – Perspectives on Glocalization, Gili S. Drori, Markus A. Höllerer, Peter Walgenbach (Eds.), Routledge, New York/London, 2014 xv+432 pp., 78,95$ (paperback), ISBN: 978-0-415-8. Journal of International Management, 21, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2014.11.001
Petros, S., Johnson, M., & Enquist, B. (2016). Service Innovation in a Complex Service System : Public Transit Service Sustainability Business Cases. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224(August 2015), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.459
Ritzer, G. (1983). The McDonaldization of Society. Journal of American Culture, 6(1), 371–379.
Ritzer, G. (2003). The Globalization of Nothing. SAIS Review, XXIII(2), 189–200.
Rivera, J. D., & Landahl, M. R. (2019). An environment conducive to bureaucratic innovation ?: Exploring the potential for public entrepreneurship within FEMA. Journal of Urban Management, (March), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.001
Scupola, A., & Zanfei, A. (2016). Governance and innovation in public sector services : The case of the digital library ☆. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.005
Shareef, M. A., Raman, R., Baabdullah, A. M., Mahmud, R., Uddin, J., Kabir, H., … Mukerji, B. (2019). International Journal of Information Management Public service reformation : Relationship building by mobile technology. International Journal of Information Management, 49(March), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.007
Sigismondi, P. (2011). The Economics of Information , Communication , and Entertainment The Impacts of Digital Technology in the 21st Century (D. Gerbarg, ed.). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Sobari, W. (2019). Menulis Proposal Inovasi Pelayanan Publik. Malang.
Sousa, M. D. M., Soares, R., Najberg, E., & Medeiros, J. J. (2015). Portraying innovation in the public service of Brazil: Frameworks, systematization and characterization. Revista de Administração, 50(4), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1213
Stoshikj, M., Kryvinska, N., & Strauss, C. (2016). Service Systems and Service Innovation : two pillars of Service Science. Procedia - Procedia Computer Science, 83(Ant), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.118
Torregrosa-hetland, S., Pelkonen, A., Oksanen, J., & Kander, A. (2019). The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations – A comparison of Finland. Research Policy, (December 2018), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001
Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Sepulveda, L., & Mcmullin, C. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics : The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy, 46(10), 1755–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.003
Weber, K. M., Heller-schuh, B., & Godoe, H. (2014). ICT-enabled system innovations in public services : Experiences from intelligent transport systems. Telecommunications Policy, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.12.004
Winarno, B. (2008). Globalisasi dan Masa Depan Demokrasi. Global & Strategis, 3(2), 123–141.
Downloads
Published
2020-06-01
Issue
Section
Artikel
License
Authors Who Publish whit this journal agree to the following term :
Copyright on any article is retained by the Journal
- Author grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this;
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work;
- Every accepted manuscript should be accompanied by Copyright Transfer Agreement (CTA), prior to the article publication. CTA can be downloaded here;
=====================================================================================================
Penulis yang mempublikasikan naskahnya pada Jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik jurnal.
- Penulis mengakui bahwa Jurnal ARISTO berhak sebagai mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan bekerja secara bersamaan dibawah Creative Commons Attribution License yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk membagi pekerjaan dengan pengakuan dari pengarang dan publikasi pertama dalam jurnal ARISTO;
- Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif  dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain (misal: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dll), dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertamakali pada Jurnal ARISTO;
- Penulis diperbolehkan dan didorong untuk mengirimkan pekerjaan mereka secara daring (misal melalui respositories atau website instansi penulis) sebelum atau selama proses pengiriman pada Jurnal ARISTO berlangsung, ini dapat menjadikan pertukaran informasi yang sangat produktif, dan serta menjadikan kutipan yang banyak dari publikasi;
- Setiap naskah yang diterima wajib menyertakan Perjanjian Pemindahan Hakcipta (Copyright Transfer Agreement/CTA), sebelum artikel diterbitkan. CTA dapat diunduh di sini
