Pertarungan Elite Lokal dalam Menentukan Sistem Pemerintahan Nagari di Kabupaten Agam

Ujang Wardi, Aidinil Zetra, Asrinaldi. Asrinaldi.

Abstract


The presence of Law No. 6 of 2014 as a form of central recognition of the regions, provides new opportunities for elitees at the local level in determining the choice of "berdesa", "berdesa adat" or "kelurahan". What is meant by the local elitee is the adat elitee (ninik mamak) and the government elitee (non ninik mamak, 'they are the generation born in the 1970s, presumably not understanding the concept of nagari, and more absorbing the concepts of modernization'). This conception is the space in arranging the nagari for the local elitee in Minangkabau as a form of the inability of Law No. 22 of 1999 and Law No. 32 of 2004 which has been accommodating the central interest to the local. In its praxis, Law No. 6 of 2014 encourages the dynamics of political interest at the local level with the existence of two distinct interests between the adat elitee and the government elitee who have held the power at the local level. This study uses the qualitative method with case study approach. The results of this study indicate the attractiveness of elitee interests at the local level, in the choice between the administrative-based of nagari and the adat-based of nagari. The attractiveness is based on two interests between philosophical interests and pragmatic interests for power. Regardless of the two interests that occurred, Law no. 6 of 2014 is a momentum for local elitees to gain legitimacy and authority, as a form of recognition gained by local elitees.


Keywords


Local Elitee, Law no. 6 of 2014, Political Interes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asrinaldi. (2017). Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia, Otonomi, Nagari, dan Sosial Budaya di Sumatera Barat. Bukittinggi: Rumahkayu Pustaka Utama.

Arba, S. M. (1998). Demitologisasi Politik Indonesia Mengusung Eliteisisme Dalam Orde Baru. In F. D. Anwar, Format Politik Orde Baru dan Agenda Pengembangan Demokrasi Politik. Jakarta: Pustaka Cidesindo.

Dahrendorf, R. (1986). Konflik dan Konflik Dalam Masyarakat Industri. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Florian, C. (2000). The Handbook of Sosiolinguistik. oxford: Blackwell publishers.

Moleung, L. J. (2005). Metodologi Peneliteian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nordholt, H. S. (2007). Politik Lokal Di Indonesia. Leiden: Kerja Sama KITLV dan Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Shalihin, N. (2014). Demokrasi di Nagari Para Tuan. (M. Sholihin, Ed.) Padang, Sumatera Barat: Imam Bonjol Press.

Shalihin, N. (2003). Demokrasi Lokal Di Bawah Bayang-Bayang Negara Terhadap Nagari Di Minangkabau. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: Tesis UGM.

Tualeka, W. N. (2017). Teori konflik Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern. Al-hikmah , 34.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No.22 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 25 Tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah. Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.

Varma, S. (2007). Teori Politik Modern. Jakarta: Raja Gravindo Persada.

Wartiharjono, S. (2017). Potensi Konflik dan Pembentukan Modal Sosial: Belajar Dari Sebuah Desa Transmigran di Kalimatan Timur. Masyarakar, Kebudayaan dan Politik , 30, 84-93


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 8 times
PDF - 5 times

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24269/ars.v7i1.1291

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 ARISTO

 View My Stats

Flag Counter

 

Creative Commons License
Aristo Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

INDEXING