THE SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF INDONESIAN NATIONAL LIBRARY’S TWITTER AND INSTAGRAM

Authors

  • Cecep Ibrahim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24269/pls.v5i2.4412

Abstract

Social media is one of the technological devices that can be used by the public to disseminate data or information in real time. In this case, the approach used is the Social Media Analytic (SMA) framework, especially Sentiment Analysis (SA) using Brand24. Sentiment Analysis is a measurement of human sentiment/emotional on social media based on content analysis (positive/negative/neutral). This study aims to determine the analysis of sentiment on the twitter and instagram accounts of the national library. The research data was taken from Twitter and Instagram data analysis using the keywords @perpusnas1 #perpusnas #perpustakaannasional. The results showed that there were 24 mentions from twitter users and 55 mentions from Instagram users. On Twitter the number of positive sentiment analysis is 3, negative 3 and neutral is 18, while on Instagram the number of sentiment analysis is positive 33, negative 4, and neutral 18.

References

DeLone, W.,& McLean, E. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 60-95.
Ali, S.R., Dobbs, T.D., & Whitaker, I.S. (2020). Webinars in plastic and reconstructive surgery traininga review of the current landscape during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 73(7), 1357-1404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.038
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
Cambaria, E., Schuller, B., Xia, Y., & Havasi, C. (2013). New Avenues in Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28, 15–21. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1109/MIS.2013.30
Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013). Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003
Dwianto, R. A., Nurmandi, A., & Salahudin, S. (2021). The Sentiments Analysis of Donald Trump and Jokowi’s Twitters on Covid-19 Policy Dissemination. Webology, 18(1), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V18I1/WEB18096
Feldman, R. (2013). Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis. Communications of the ACM, 56(4), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/2436256.2436274
Feldman, R., & Sanger, J. (2007). The Text Mining Handbook: Advanced Approaches in Analyzing Unstructured Data. In The Text Mining Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
Gautam, G., & Yadav, D. (2014). Sentiment analysis of twitter data using machine learning approaches and semantic analysis. 2014 7th International Conference on Contemporary Computing, IC3 2014, 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2014.6897213
Mayfield, A. (2008). What is social media? iCrossing.
Murfi, H., Siagian, F. L., & Satria, Y. (2019). Topic features for machine learning-based sentiment analysis in Indonesian tweets. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 12(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJICC-04-2018-0057
Nulty, P., Theocharis, Y., Popa, S. A., Parnet, O., & Benoit, K. (2016). Social media and political communication in the 2014 elections to the European Parliament. Electoral Studies, 44, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.014
Pratama, Y., Roberto Tampubolon, A., Diantri Sianturi, L., Diana Manalu, R., & Frietz Pangaribuan, D. (2019). Implementation of Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Using Naïve Bayes Algorithm to Know the People Responses to Debate of DKI Jakarta Governor Election. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012102
Prayoga, K. (2020). How jokowi communicates with the public during covid-19 crisis: An analysis of tweets on twitter. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(2), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2020-3602-26
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social Media and Political Communication: a Social Media Analytics Framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3
Stieglitz, S., Mirbabaie, M., Ross, B., & Neuberger, C. (2018). Social media analytics – Challenges in topic discovery, data collection, and data preparation. International Journal of Information Management, 39(December 2017), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.002
Tsou, M. H., Yang, J. A., Han, S., Jung, C. Te, Gawron, J. M., Allen, C., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2015). Social Media Analytics and Research Test-bed (SMART Dashboard). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2015-July. https://doi.org/10.1145/2789187.2789196

Downloads

Published

2022-02-21

How to Cite

Ibrahim, C. (2022). THE SENTIMENT ANALYSIS OF INDONESIAN NATIONAL LIBRARY’S TWITTER AND INSTAGRAM. Publication Library and Information Science, 5(2), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.24269/pls.v5i2.4412

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Licence

This Journal will place Author as Copyright Holder, The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 

Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

 

Plagiarism Notice

PUBLIS Editorial board recognizes that plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) upon identification of plagiarism/similarities in articles submitted for publication in PUBLIS. PUBLIS will use Turnitin's originality checking software as the tool in detecting similarities of texts in article manuscripts and the final version articles ready for publication. A maximum of 30% of similarities is allowed for the submitted papers. Should we find more than 30% of the similarity index, the article will be returned to the author for correction and resubmission.