COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA AND THAILAND STUDENTS' MATHEMATICAL THINKING ABILITY

Anisa Agustiana* -  Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Serang, Indonesia
Andika Arisetyawan -  Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Serang, Indonesia
Supriadi - -  Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Kampus Serang, Indonesia
Krittika Anusaen -  Mahasarakham University Demonstration School, Thailand

DOI : 10.24269/silogisme.v8i2.7909

This research aims to compare mathematical thinking abilities between elementary school students in Tangerang, Indonesia and Mahasarakham, Thailand. The method used in this research is a comparative study which is carried out by comparing the answers to mathematics test questions given to the research subjects, namely elementary school students in grades 3 and 5. The main aim of this research is to find out the factors that cause differences in the answers of each student. The results of this research show that there are differences between students in answering mathematics test questions caused by variations in the level of intelligence within one class, including certain aspects such as understanding concepts, problem solving skills, and abstract thinking abilities. Thus, each student's mathematical thinking ability can be influenced by specific factors that include their cognitive characteristics and mathematical development. Even though students' answers vary through different processes, this shows the uniqueness of the approach and mathematical thinking strategies applied by each student in completing the test. It is hoped that this research can make a contribution to the world of education, especially in designing learning plans that are tailored to the characteristics and abilities of each student

Supplement Files

Keywords
Mathematical thinking, Indonesia, Thailand
  1. Abdillah, R., Susiswo, S., & Susanto, H. (2022). Komunikasi Matematis Siswa pada Materi Teorema Pythagoras Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1871
  2. Ahmad, G., 1, S., & Sudiana, R. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VIII Berdasarkan Teori Pirie-Kieren. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2181
  3. Alhadoor, Z. A. N., Aldbyani, A., & Alshammari, K. K. (2023). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of strategies and programs used to address the mathematics learning difficulties. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), em2337. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13607
  4. Amaludin, R., Esita, Z., Idhayani, N., Salma, S., Muhammadiyah Kendari, U., Ahmad Dahlan Kendari, J. K., & Tenggara, S. (2023). Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.1920
  5. Apriningtyas, S., & Amalia, N. (2023). Reading and Viewing Ability of Third Grade Students in Elementary School. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i2.58628
  6. Ar, A., Awaludin, R., Selvia, N., & Andrari, F. R. (2021). Mathematical Representation of Students in Solving Mathematic Problems Reviewed from Extrovert-Introvert Personality. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2), 323–329. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJEE
  7. Arifin, Y. F., & Nugroho, Y. S. (2023). Website-Based Learning Media on Reading and Numeracy Content for Third Grade Elementary Schools. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i1.58269
  8. Arisetyawan, A., Taher, T., & Fauzi, I. (2021). K R E A N O Creative-Innovative Mathematics (education) Journal Integrating the Concept of Plane Figure and Baduy Local Wisdom as a Me-dia Alternative of Mathematics Learning In Elementary Schools. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/kreano
  9. Bevan, D., & Capraro, M. M. (2021). Posing Creative Problems: A Study of Elementary Students’ Mathematics Understanding. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0654. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11109
  10. Brewster, B. J. M., & Miller, T. (2020). Missed Opportunity in Mathematics Anxiety. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0600. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8405
  11. Dewi, N. S., & Dasari, D. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Kemampuan Pembuktian Matematis. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1987
  12. Dwi Rohmawati, A., & Fathoni, A. (2022). Improving Elementary School Student’s Critical Thinking Skills through HOTS-Based Mathematics Question. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6(3), 631–637. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i4.55892
  13. Erbilgin, E., & Gningue, S. M. (2023). Using the onto-semiotic approach to analyze novice algebra learners’ meaning-making processes with different representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10247-8
  14. Ernawati, E., & Firdaus, A. M. (2020). Analysis of mathematical ability to solve PISA questions on quantity content. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v6i2.921
  15. Fairus, F., Dewi, I., & Simamora, E. (2023). Keterkaitan Filsafat Matematika dengan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis IT. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1921
  16. Gagatsis, A., Deliyianni, E., Elia, I., Panaoura, A., & Michael-Chrysanthou, P. (2016). Fostering representational flexibility in the mathematical working space of rational numbers. Bolema - Mathematics Education Bulletin, 30(54), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v30n54a14
  17. Gyanthi, I Gusti Ayu Tri Agustiana, & Dewe Gede Firstia. (2023). LAPS-HEURISTIC Learning Model Improves Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i1.58407
  18. Güveli, E., Bulut, D. B., & Güveli, H. (2021). Electronic Conceptual Change Texts Prepared About Fractions. In TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 20).
  19. Hanany, F., & Sumaji, S. (2021). BERFIKIR KREATIF DALAM MATEMATIKA. JURNAL SILOGISME: Kajian Ilmu Matematika dan Pembelajarannya, 5(2), 77-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.24269/silogisme.v5i2.2888
  20. Harahap, K., & Nurlaelah, E. (2023). Analisis Kompetensi Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas IX dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1427–1438. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.2129
  21. Hartman, J. R., Hart, S., Nelson, E. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2023). Designing mathematics standards in agreement with science. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(3), em0739. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13179
  22. Herheim, R. (2023). On the origin, characteristics, and usefulness of instrumental and relational understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(3), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10225-0
  23. Heron, M., & Palfreyman, D. M. (2021). Exploring Higher-Order Thinking in Higher Education Seminar Talk. College Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2021.2018397
  24. Lingefjärd, T., & Ghosh, J. (2022). Enhancing students mathematical thinking using applets. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(2), em015. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12318
  25. Liu, J., Ma, Y., Sun, X., Zhu, Z., & Xu, Y. (2022). A Systematic Review of Higher-Order Thinking by Visualizing its Structure Through HistCite and CiteSpace Software. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00614-5
  26. Lopes, A. P. C. (2022). Aspects of attitudes towards mathematics in modeling activities: Usefulness, interest, and social roles of mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), em0711. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12394
  27. Lutfiyana, L., Pujiastuti, E., & Kharisudin, I. (2023). Systematic Literature Review: Resiliensi Matematis dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2167–2177. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2445
  28. Marczewska, M., Weresa, M. A., & Lachowicz, M. (2023). Towards Creativity and Innovation in Universities: Study on Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01139-6
  29. Mefiana, S. A., Herman, T., & Hasanah, A. (2023). Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Daya Juang Produktif. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2368–2381. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2552
  30. Meng, G.M. (2022). Inside Out MATHS Workbook 4. Singapore: Sim Wee Chee
  31. Meng, G.M. (2022). Inside Out MATHS Workbook 5. Singapore: Sim Wee Chee
  32. Miles, H., & Huberman, A. M. S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A Methods Sourcebook.v
  33. Mitchell, L., & George, L. (2022). Exploring mathematics anxiety among primary school students: Prevalence, mathematics performance and gender. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0692. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12073
  34. Muhdiyanto, A. R., Hidayanto, E., & Chandra, T. D. (2022). Koneksi Matematis Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Field-Independent Pada Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 2882–2894. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1724
  35. Nur Ahzan, Z., Wua Laja, Y. P., & Hijriani, L. (2023). Efektivitas Pengembangan Media Bahasa Pemrograman Open-Source dalam Penerapan Computational Thinking Mahasiswa. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1519–1532. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.2282
  36. Nurfadhilah AM. Hindi, A., & HR, I. S. (2023). Student Thinking Process in Solving Mathematical Representation Problems. Mathematics Education Journal, 7(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v7i1.24830
  37. Pandra. (2017). CORRESPONDENCE V.
  38. Pasáčková, J. (2023). Online Courses of Mathematics for Entrance Exams. In TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 22, Issue 1).
  39. Pebrianti, A., Juandi, D., & Nurlaelah, E. (2022). Reversible Thinking Ability in Solving Mathematics Problems. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1905
  40. Radhy, Z. H. (2018). Application of Multiply Regression Linear Model and New Technology Method in Estimating Learning and Education of Students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3978
  41. Rahmasuri, A., Dwijayanti, I., & Wulandari, D. (2022). PROFIL KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS SISWA DITINJAU DARI SELF CONFIDENCE SISWA. JURNAL SILOGISME: Kajian Ilmu Matematika dan Pembelajarannya, 7(1), 38-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.24269/silogisme.v7i1.3267
  42. Rifai, Muhammad. 2011. Politik Pendidikan Nasional. Yogyakarta:Ar Ruzz Media
  43. Risaldi, R., Susiswo, S., & Irawati, S. (2023). Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Gender. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2437–2451. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.2479
  44. Rohman, A. A., Sholihah, N., & Maslihah, S. (n.d.). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN DISPOSISI MATEMATIS PESERTA DIDIK DAN GENDER KELAS VII.
  45. Rulistiani, V. U., Asyura, I., Kamali, A. S., & Linda, L. (2023). Pengaruh Metode Brainstorming Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1366–1378. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.1784
  46. Santy, A., Ramadoni, R., & Jufri, L. H. (2023). Investigasi Metode Perkalian Dua Bilangan untuk Siswa Kelas VII SMPN 1 Koto Baru Kabupaten Dharmasraya. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 714–727. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1755
  47. Scheiner, T. (2023). Shifting the ways prospective teachers frame and notice student mathematical thinking: from deficits to strengths. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10235-y
  48. Sdn, D. I., Sari, B., Dati Salsabilah, I., Rahman Hakim, Z., Taufik, M., Guru, P., Dasar, S., Sultan, U., & Tirtayasa, A. (n.d.). PROSES PENANAMAN KARAKTER GEMAR MEMBACA PADA SISWA KELAS III MELALUI PELAKSAAAN PROGRAM LITERASI.
  49. Siregar, N. C., Rosli, R., & Nite, S. (2023). Students’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) based on parental education and gender factors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060
  50. Sulastri, S., Marwan, M., & Duskri, M. (2017). Kemampuan representasi matematis siswa SMP melalui pendekatan pendidikan matematika realistik. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 10(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v10i1.101
  51. Supriadi, S. (n.d.). Inovasi dan Miskonsepsi Penyampaian Materi Matematika SD.
  52. Syafri, F. S. (2019). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis dan Kemampuan Pembuktian Matematika. Jurnal Edumath, 3(1), 49–55.
  53. Tri, A., Yanindah, C., & Ratu, N. (2021). Pengembagan E-Modul SUGAR Berbasis Android.
  54. Zhang, H. (2023). A Simulated Situational Assessment System for Evaluating Pre-Service Teachers’ Information Teaching Ability. In TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 22, Issue 1). https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6796-6219

Full Text: Supp. File(s):
The Statement of Authenticity of Scientific Work
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (208KB)    Indexing metadata
Article Info
Submitted: 2023-09-25
Published: 2023-12-30
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: