Examining the Role of ICT in Addressing Potential Issues in Indonesian Absentee Voting in Malaysia

Helen Dian Fridayani* -  Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Li Chun Chiang -  Departement of Political Science, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, Province of China
Fadia Azzahra -  Departement of Government Studies, Social and Political Science Faculty, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v12i3.11575

This paper investigates the challenges and potential solutions for absentee voting among Indonesian migrant workers in Malaysia during the 2024 General Election. Key issues include administrative inefficiencies, outdated voter lists, legal ambiguities, and vulnerabilities in postal voting, exacerbated by geographic and socio-economic barriers, particularly for rural and undocumented workers. Using qualitative content analysis with NVivo, the study explores how Information and Communication Technology (ICT), such as digital voter registration and blockchain voting, can enhance transparency, data accuracy, and election security. The research is novel in its focus on ICT solutions tailored to the unique challenges faced by Indonesian migrants in Malaysia, a topic that has been largely overlooked. It underscores the importance of coordinated efforts among government agencies, NGOs, and technology providers for effective implementation. While ICT offers promising opportunities for reform, challenges related to infrastructure, digital literacy, and voter trust remain significant. The study provides practical recommendations for improving absentee voting, with broader implications for countries with large expatriate populations, emphasizing the need for multi-stakeholder collaboration to ensure inclusivity and electoral integrity. Future recommendations should focus on addressing these challenges and maximizing the potential of ICT. Comprehensive policy reforms are needed to clarify legal ambiguities and streamline administrative processes, making voter registration and voting mechanisms more accessible and efficient. Governments should invest in robust digital infrastructure and implement digital literacy programs to empower migrant workers, especially those in rural areas or with undocumented status. Advanced technologies like blockchain should be further explored to enhance transparency, security, and data accuracy in absentee voting systems. Collaboration among government agencies, NGOs, and technology providers is essential for successful implementation. Future research should also examine the long-term impact of ICT-based voting systems on voter trust and participation, as well as conduct comparative studies with other countries facing similar challenges.
Keywords
Absentee Voting; 2024 General Election; Voter Disenfranchisement; Information and Communication Technology (ICT); Digital Voter Registration;
  1. Afifa, L. (2024). Fraud in absentee voting: The case of the 2024 Indonesian General Election. Rumah Pemilu Press.
  2. Ali, M. F. M., & Yusoff, M. A. (2022). Malaysian Electoral System Reform and the Challenges of its Implementation After the 14th General Election. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i1.1258
  3. Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Southeast Asia’s troubling elections: Nondemocratic pluralism in Indonesia. Journal Democracy, 30(4). https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/nondemocratic-pluralism-in-indonesia/
  4. Benabdallah, A., Madhoun, A. A., Coudert, L., Madhoun, N. El, & Badra, M. (2022). Analysis of blockchain solutions for E-voting: a systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 10. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9812616
  5. Boardman, C. J. (2019). Voter Privacy: A Transatlantic Comparison of Electoral Systems [Georgetown University]. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1054910
  6. Boehm, D. A. (2016). Returned: Going and coming in an age of deportation (1st ed.). University of California Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1bd6k3g
  7. Bustami, R., Suyatno, & Wekke, I. S. (2016). Migrants In Nusantara: Indonesian And Malaysian Perspectives. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol1iss2pp63-74
  8. Caramani, D., & Grotz, F. (2015). Beyond citizenship and residence? Exploring the extension of voting rights in the age of globalization. In Voting Rights in the Era of Globalization, 22(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.981668
  9. Danezis, G., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Hansen, M., Hoepman, J.-H., Metayer, D. Le, Tirtea, R., & Schiffner, S. (2015). Privacy and data protection by design-from policy to engineering. Arxiv. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2824/38623
  10. Delacourt, S. (2013). Shopping for votes: How politicians choose us and we choose them. Madeira Park, BC : Douglas & McIntyre. https://archive.org/details/shoppingforvotes0000dela/page/n6/mode/1up
  11. Dettman, S. (2023). Challenges of ethnic party adaptation in power-sharing systems: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affair, 43(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034231219460
  12. Djumadin, Z. (2023). Strategy for Socialization of New Political Parties Ahead of the 2024 General Election (Case Study of the Gelora Party). Jurnal Info Sains: Informatika Dan Sains, 13(3). https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/InfoSains/article/view/3320
  13. Dressel, B. (2024). Courts and Politics in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770088
  14. Erlingsson, H. (2019). External Voting in Developing Countries: Strategic Bargaining and the Role of Remittances. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/18608632
  15. Farooq, S., Ikram, N., & Nassar, S. (2024). ICT-based solutions for rural disenfranchisement in voting processes. Technology and Governance Studies Press.
  16. Faruk, M. J. H., Alam, F., Islam, M., & Rahman, A. (2024). Transforming online voting: a novel system utilizing blockchain and biometric verification for enhanced security, privacy, and transparency. Cluster Computing, 27. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10586-023-04261-x
  17. FREEDMAN, A., & TIBURZI, R. (2012). Progress and Caution: Indonesia’s Democracy. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 39(3). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23526552
  18. FRYE, T., REUTER, O. J., & SZAKONYI, D. (2014). Political Machines At Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace. World Politics, 66(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/24577011
  19. General Election Commission. (2023). Revised permanent voter list for Malaysian voters. General Election Comission.
  20. Giotis, C., & Hall, C. (2023). Better Foreign Correspondence Starts at Home: Changing Practice Through Diasporic Knowledge. Journalisme Practice, 17(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1930105
  21. Goodman, N., Hayes, H. A., McGregor, R. M., Pruysers, S., & Spicer, Z. (2024). Voting Online: Technology and Democracy in Municipal Elections. McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.17102072
  22. Ikram, K., & Nassar, H. (2022). The Egyptian Economy in the Twenty-first Century: The Hard Road to Inclusive Prosperity. The American University in Cairo Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2vm3b3k
  23. Indonesian Migrant Workers Protection Agency. (2023). Data on Indonesian migrant workers in Malaysia. Indonesian Migrant Workers Protection Agency.
  24. Jaca, G. B., & Torneo, A. R. (2021). Explaining (non) participation in overseas voting: the case of overseas Filipino voters in Japan in the 2016 elections. Diaspora Studies, 14(1). https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/brill/explaining-non-participation-in-overseas-voting-the-case-of-overseas-FS4cccCqpE
  25. Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2020). Citizens versus the internet: Confronting digital challenges with cognitive tools. Phychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620946707
  26. Lafleur, J.-M. (2015). The enfranchisement of citizens abroad: variations and explanations. Democratization, 22(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.979163
  27. Lafleur, J.-M., & Mescoli, E. (2018). Creating undocumented EU migrants through welfare: A conceptualization of undeserving and precarious citizenship. Sociology, 52(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518764615
  28. Lovato, K., Lopez, C., Karimli, L., & Abrams, L. S. (2018). The impact of deportation-related family separations on the well-being of Latinx children and youth: A review of the literature. Children and Youth Services Review, 95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.011
  29. Lubis, M., Kartiwi, M., & Zulhuda, S. (2016). Election fraud and privacy related issues: addressing electoral integrity. 2016 International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7905720
  30. Martin, M. E. (2014). The Political Power of Diaspora as External Actors in Armed Civil Conflict: Ethnonationalist Conflict-Generated Diaspora Use of social media in Transnational Political Engagement in Homeland Conflict: The Case of Rwanda [University of Bradford]. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Political-Power-of-Diaspora-as-External-Actors-Martin/cccae698ac7136272bc52e69d92cc6b1e8f52a74
  31. Meredith, M., & Endter, Z. (2016). Aging into absentee voting: Evidence from texas. Working Paper. https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~marcmere/workingpapers/AgingIntoAbsentee.pdf
  32. Messing, J. T., Becerra, D., Ward-Lasher, A., & Androff, D. K. (2015). Latinas’ perceptions of law enforcement: Fear of deportation, crime reporting, and trust in the system. Affilia, 30(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109915576520
  33. Migrant Care. (2023). Statement on the overseas permanent voters list and sectoral cooperation. Migrain Care.
  34. Novia, H., & Djelantik, S. (2024). Indonesia Diplomacy in Protecting the Rights of Indonesian Migrant Domestic Workers in Malaysia (2017-2022). Insignia Journal of International Relations, 11(1). https://jos.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/insignia/article/download/10087/5255/
  35. Ostwald, K., & Oliver, S. (2019). Four arenas: Malaysia’s 2018 election, reform, and democratization. Democratization. Democratization, 27(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1713757
  36. Pitzer, V. E., Chitwood, M., Havumaki, J., Menzies, N. A., Perniciaro, S., Warren, J. L., Weinberger, D. M., & Cohen, T. (2021). The Impact of Changes in Diagnostic Testing Practices on Estimates of COVID-19 Transmission in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 190(9). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwab089
  37. Purnamasari, S. (2024). Electoral fraud in absentee voting: A review of the Kuala Lumpur Overseas Election Committee. Election Integrity Press.
  38. Raganata, G. (2019). Challenges and Innovation of Indonesia Overseas Election in Tokyo. Jurnal Politik, 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v5i1.1021
  39. Rahman, M. M., & Huq, H. (2023). Implications of ICT for the livelihoods of women farmers: a study in the teesta river basin, Bangladesh. Sustainabillity, 15(19). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914432
  40. Rodan, G. (2018). Participation without democracy: Containing conflict in Southeast Asia. Cornell University Press. https://scholar.archive.org/work/khqq56nctrg5leyrbizmcknwb4/access/wayback/https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/v3/PCD/article/download/1034/480
  41. Sani, A., Wiliani, N., & Husain, T. (2019). Spreadsheet Usability Testing in Nielsen’s Model among Users of ITSMEs to Improve Company Performance. European Journal Of Scientific Exploration, 2(6). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Asrul-Sani/publication/341177525_Spreadsheet_Usability_Testing_in_Nielsen’s_Model_among_Users_of_IT_SMEs_to_Improve_Company_Performance/links/5eb24af045851592d6bd5948/Spreadsheet-Usability-Testing-in-Nielsens-Model-among-Users-of-IT-SMEs-to-Improve-Company-Performance.pdf
  42. Sharma, S. K., Al-Badi, A. H., Govindaluri, S. M., & Al-Kharusi, M. H. (2016). Predicting motivators of cloud computing adoption: A developing country perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.073
  43. Stride, G. (2022). Electoral Administrators’ Perceptions of Electoral Integrity in England [University of Exete]. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/133139/StrideG.pdf?sequence=1
  44. Sunarso, S., Suyato, S., Kuncorowati, P. W., Manik, T. S., & Ali Masykur Fathurrahman. (2022). Elections as a means of citizens political education: a comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i1.44305
  45. Suphanchaimat, R., Kantamaturapoj, K., Putthasri, W., & Prakongsai, P. (2015). Challenges in the provision of healthcare services for migrants: a systematic review through providers’ lens. BMC Health Services Research, 15(390). https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-015-1065-z
  46. Tambe, E. B. (2021). Electoral Participation in Newly Consolidated Democracies Turnout in Africa, Latin America, East Asia, and Post-Communist Europe. ROUTLEDGE. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781003031482&type=googlepdf
  47. Wartoyo, F. X., & Tungga, B. (2019). The Consept And Its Implementation Of Indonesian Legislative Elections Based On The Pancasila Democracy Perspective. YUSTISIA, 8(1). https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/yustisia/article/view/13226
  48. Williams, O. (2020). The Interface of Information Security, Risk, and Privacy on the Humanitarian Frontline. American University. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/The_Interface_of_Information_Security_Ri.html?id=5EJqzwEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
  49. Wu, A. Y. C. (2021). Migration, family and networks: Timorese seasonal workers’ social support in Australia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 62(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12308
  50. Wydra, S. (2015). Challenges for technology diffusion policy to achieve socio-economic goals. Technology in Society, 41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.12.002

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2025-02-17
Published: 2024-12-04
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: