PERSEPSI PEMUSTAKA TERHADAP PUSTAKAWAN DALAM PELAYANAN REFERENSI DI PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24269/pls.v1i2.692Abstract This study aims to determine the level of user perceptual categories of the librarian in reference service. By knowing user perception, it can be used as a donation of thought and consideration for the performance of the librarian in the library in order to make the services in the reference at the Library of the State Islamic University Sunan Kalidjaga is as maximal as user expectation. The type of this research is quantitative research. The sample number of this research is 100 users which take from the user that uses the service of reference or population. The sample was taken by accidental sampling method. The researcher collected the data by using questionnaire, observation, interviews, and documentation. While the analysis of the data used descriptive quantitative data analysis. Based on the description of the results of research on the user perception in the librarian reference service at the Library of the State Islamic University Sunan Kalidjaga, it can be concluded that the general perception of user to the librarian in the reference service can be categorized into good category with the score of grand mean; 2.64. While the indicator score for the librarians who find information to answer a specific question, can be good category with a grand mean score; 2.70. For the second indicator, librarians help users find the information was categorized into good category with a grand mean score; 2.70. The third indicator, librarians guide users in using library resources and how to conduct research were categorized into good category with a grand mean score; 2.53. This results indicate that there are no indicators that the score of the grand mean is 3:26 to 4:00 or excellent category, it means that the management of library and librarians in the Library of the State Islamic University of Yogyakarta Sunan Kalidjaga should maintain and improve its performance in serving the users at State Islamic University of Yogyakarta Sunan KalijagaÂ
References
Achmad, dkk. 2012. Layanan Cinta Perwujudan Layanan Prima Perpustakaan. Jakarta: Sagung Seto.
Afinda, Nur Hidayati. 2013. Persepsi Pemustaka Terhadap Pelayanan Referensi Di Kantor Perpustakaan Dan ArsipKabupaten Kulon Progo Yogyakarta (skripsi). Yogyakarta: Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan, Fakultas Adab dan Ilmu Budaya UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
-----------. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Asep, Syaifur. Dalam http://pustbangun. blogspot.com/2012/04/pustakawan-referensi.html. diunduh pada tanggal tanggal 13 Juni 2014 pukul 13.20.
Azwar, Saefuddin. 1997. Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Basuki, Sulistyo. 1992. Teknis jasa dan dokumentasi. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia.
Bopp, Richard E. and Smith, Linda C (Eds.). 1991. Reference and information services. Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited.
Badudu. 1994. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
David Reza Hermawan. 2013. Persepsi Pemustaka Terhadap Fungsi Pelayanan Referensi Di Kantor Arsip Dan Perpustakaan Kabupaten Klaten (skripsi). Yogyakarta: Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan, Fakultas Adab dan Ilmu Budaya UIN SunanKalijaga Yogyakarta.
Didik Subagia. 2010. “Persepsi Pemustaka Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Referensi Di Perpustakaan Daerah Kulon Progo (skripsi). Yogyakarta: Program Studi Ilmu Perpustakaan, Fakultas Adab dan Ilmu Budaya UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
Evans, G.Edward. 2009. Introduction to library public service America: Marty Bloomberg.
Eriyanto. 2007. Teknik Sampling Analisis Opini Publik. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Lasa ,Hs. 2005. Manajemen Perpustakaan .Yogyakarta : Gama Media.
Martoatmojo, Karmidi. 1999. Pelayanan Bahan Pustaka. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Qalyubi, Syihabuddin, dkk. 2007. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, Fakultas Adab dan Ilmu Budaya.
Rahmat, Jalaluddin. 2000. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rahman, Abdul. 2009. Pengantar Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Sagung Seto.
Riduwan. 2010. Metode dan Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Saleh, Abdul Rahman. 20111. Manajemen Perpustakaan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Soetminah. 1992. perpustakaan, kepustakawanan , dan pustakawan . Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
-------------. 2010. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
-------------. 2013. Methode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sulistyo- Basuki. 1993. Pengantar ilmu perpustakaan. Jakarta : Gramedia.
Sutarno, NS. 2006. Manajemen Perpustakaan: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Sagung Seto.
Suwarno, Wiji. 2010. Pengetahuan Dasar Kepustakaan. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.
----------. 2010. Ilmu Perpustakaan & Kode Etik Pustakawan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Widyawan, Rosa. 2012. Pelayanan Referensi Berawal Dari Senyuman. Bandung: CV Bahtera Ilmu.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Licence
This Journal will place Author as Copyright Holder, The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
Plagiarism Notice
PUBLIS Editorial board recognizes that plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) upon identification of plagiarism/similarities in articles submitted for publication in PUBLIS. PUBLIS will use Turnitin's originality checking software as the tool in detecting similarities of texts in article manuscripts and the final version articles ready for publication. A maximum of 30% of similarities is allowed for the submitted papers. Should we find more than 30% of the similarity index, the article will be returned to the author for correction and resubmission.
_baru.png)






