PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN BANK TERHADAP NASABAH KORBAN KEJAHATAN ITE DI BIDANG PERBANKAN

Yudanto Yudanto* -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
Natangsa Surbakti -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
Wardah Yuspin -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v8i1.7764

The recent rise in ITE crimes in the banking sector has given rise to new problems, both legally and economically. These crimes often involve resource users, infrastructure, and customer identities. As a result, in terms of implementing criminal law, especially banking and financial services companies must bear responsibility for their customers' losses. The importance of bank accountability towards its customers who are victims of ITE crimes from a criminal law perspective is the objective discussed in this research. This legal research refers to positive legal norms in accordance with the hierarchy of existing laws and regulations, legal principles, legal doctrine, as well as other literature relating to Bank responsibility for crimes in criminal law. The results of the analysis from this research show the importance of protecting bank customers by banks and that there have been efforts made by the Indonesian banking industry to empower and protect consumers with the banking criminal regulations in Law no. 10 of 1998 which is mentioned in detail therein.

Keywords
Pertanggungjawaban Bank, Korban Kejahatan, Kejahatan Perbankan.
  1. Anugrah, D. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Korban Duplikasi Data Bank Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akta Yudisia, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.35334/ay.v5i1.1205
  2. Asmara, Y. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hilangnya Dana Nasabah di Rekening Bank Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Glosains: Jurnal Sains Global Indonesia, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.36418/glosains.v2i1.14
  3. Astrini, D. A. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Nasabah Bank Pengguna Internet Banking dari Ancaman Cybercrime. Lex Privatum, 3(1).
  4. Dakhoir, A. (2017). Hukum Syariah Compliance di Perbankan Syariah. K-Media.
  5. Febriansyah, F. I., Indiantoro, A., & Ikhwan, A. (2023). Model Kejahatan Dunia Maya (Cybercrime) Sebagai Upaya Pembentukan Hukum Nasional. Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2), 183–196. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3567290/polling-58-masyarakat-puas-kinerja-kpk,
  6. Gazali, D. S., & Rachmadi, U. (2016). Hukum Perbankan. Sinar Grafika.
  7. Hayati, A. S., & Setiawan, D. A. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Nasabah Bank Pengguna M-Banking sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Penipuan Ditinjau dari Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 3(1), 546–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.5047
  8. Juita, S. R., Astanti, D. I., & Septiandani, D. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Bank Korban Kejahatan Skimming. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 6(1), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i1.6353
  9. Kusuma, M. J. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Bank yang Menjadi Korban Kejahatan ITE di Bidang Perbankan. Jurnal Al’Adl, 5(9). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v5i9.188
  10. Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  11. Sufriadi, Y. (2021). Prevention Efforts Against E-Commerce Fraud Based on Indonesian Cyber Law. 2021 9th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9588900/metrics
  12. Sulisrudatin, N. (2018). Analisa Kasus Cybercrime Bidang Perbankan Berupa Modus Pencurian Data Kartu Kredit. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i1.296
  13. Talumewo, F. (2013). Pertanggungjawaban Bank terhadap Nasabah yang Menjadi Korban Kejahatan Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Ite). Lex Crimen, 2(1), 132. https://doi.org/Vol.II/No.1/Jan-Mrt/2013
  14. Yulia, E. S. dan R. (2010). Hukum Pidana Ekonomi. Graha Ilmu.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2023-08-23
Published: 2023-09-28
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: