PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DAN PENYELESAIAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA TERHADAP DEBITUR CIDERA JANJI

Shela Ardini* -  Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia
Annalisa Yahanan -  Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia
Ridwan Ridwan -  Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v8i1.7901

A fiduciary guarantee is a form of guarantee or security in a financial transaction where a party called the debtor (the party who borrows) gives the right to a certain asset to the creditor (the party who provides the loan or credit) as collateral for the fulfillment of the debtor's obligations to the creditor. The aim of this research is to explore legal protection and settlement strategies in cases of fiduciary guarantees for debtors who default. This research uses a normative juridical writing approach supported by empirical evidence to identify and analyze the legal framework that regulates fiduciary guarantees in various jurisdictions, such as a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research also uses normative and empirical legal analysis methods. The results of the research show that the implementation of the legal protection given to creditors in a fiduciary guarantee agreement conforms to Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, namely by providing protection through the execution of fiduciary guarantees, and ultimately providing consideration of options for creditors and debtors to be able to take action negotiate first.

Keywords
Jaminan Fidusia, Perlindungan Hukum, Cidera Janji.
  1. Adibah, S. N., Muslim, N. Z., Azizah, S. N., & Amalia, R. (2021). Urgensi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Hukum Islam Dan Pandangan Madzhab Imam Syafi’I. SYARI’AH: Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari’ah Law, 4(2), 162–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v4i2.7153
  2. Agustina, A., & Aslamiyah, S. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Dan Penyelesaian Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Debitur Cidera Janji Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 8(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i1.123
  3. Jati, I. W. (2021). Eksistensi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia. ’AAINUL HAQ: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1), 1–18.
  4. Khairina, N., & Bustamam, K. (2019). Perjanjian Dan Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 3(2), 307–334. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v3i2.5935
  5. Lestari, K. C. D., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2020). Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia yang Tidak Didaftarkan. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(3), 383–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.3.2502.383-387
  6. Ma’rifah, N. (2022). Kepastian Hukum terhadap Kreditur Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dan Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021. Notary Law Journal, 1(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i2.23
  7. Meilaputri, I. G. A. D., Suryani, L. P., & Seputra, P. G. (2019). Kekuatan Hukum Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia yang Didaftarkan Setelah Terjadinya Wanprestasi. KERTHA WICAKSANA: Sarana Komunikasi Dosen Dan Mahasiswa, 13(2), 69–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.13.2.2019.69-72
  8. Nofianti, I. N. (2021). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Apabila Debitur Cidera Janji. Supremasi Jurnal Hukum, 3(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36441/supremasi.v3i2.218
  9. Nugraha, S. N. (2021). Cidera Janji (Wanprestasi) Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia Berdasarkan Pasal 15 Ayat (3) UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 18/Puu-Xvii/2019. AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v2i2.213
  10. Riansyah, C. A., Atsar, A., & Kurniati, G. (2020). Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Dan Eksekusinya. Singaperbangsa Law Review (SILREV), 1(1), 38–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35706/silrev.v1i1.4259
  11. Rufaida, K. K. (2019). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Tanpa Titel Eksekutorial Yang Sah. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p21-40
  12. Setiono, G. C., Sulistyo, H., & Widayati, S. C. (2021). Cidera Janji dalam Perjanjian Kredit Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Transparansi Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30737/transparansi.v4i1.1510
  13. Soegianto, S, D. S. R., & Junaidi, M. (2019). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Kajian Undang- Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1658
  14. Sriono. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Pemberi Fidusia Terhadap Benda Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 7(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v7i2.1563
  15. Subagiyo, D. T., & Prasetyawati, E. (2021). Karakteristik Perlindungan Hukum Debitor Dalam Penguasaan Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Perspektif, 26(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v26i2.661
  16. Supriyati, N. (2015). Metode Penelitian Gabungan (Mixed Methods). Widyaiswara BDK, 4(1).
  17. Syafrida, & Hartati, R. (2020). Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu/Xvii/2019). ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1447
  18. Tohar, H., Iriansyah, I., & Triana, Y. (2022). Jaminan Fidusia Sebagai Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konsttitusi Nomor: 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Eksekusi:Journal of Law, 4(1), 1–21.
  19. Uyun, A., & Mujib, A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Praktik Gadai. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 14(2), 285–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v14i2.6149
  20. Wahyudi, K. A. S., & Martana, N. A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Mempunyai Klaim Asuransi. Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(10), 1–16.
  21. Winarno, J. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Independent, 1(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v1i1.5
  22. Wulandari, E. S., Ridwan, & Syarifuddin, A. (2020). Penarikan Secara Paksa Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Hubungan Perlindungan Angsuran Kredit Debitur. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 9(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v9i1.368
  23. Yasir, M. (2016). Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 3(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v3i1.3307
  24. Zakiyah, N. (2021). Reposisi Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v12i1.10208

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2023-09-24
Published: 2023-09-28
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: