ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KONFIGURASI PREDIKSI INTRA DAN INTER PADA PENGKODEAN H.265

Maulida Yasmin; Arief Suryadi Satyawan; Ichwan Nul Ichsan

doi:10.24269/mtkind.v19i2.9040

Authors

Maulida Yasmin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4188-6242
Arief Suryadi Satyawan Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, dan Universitas Nurtanio
Ichwan Nul Ichsan Sistem Telekomunikasi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24269/mtkind.v19i2.9040

Keywords:

Encoding, H.265, HEVC, Kompresi, Pengkodean Video

Abstract

The increasing demand for high-quality video delivery and storage has driven the development of more efficient video coding. H.265 is one of the latest video coding standards that provides better compression than its predecessor, H.264. This study analyzes the impact of intra and inter prediction configurations on video compression quality and efficiency in the context of H.265 encoding. The analysis is performed using Rate-Distortion (R-D) curves for several prediction configurations on each video sequence. The experiment compares intra, lowdelay, lowdelay-P, and randomaccess configurations on several video sequences. The results show that the intra configuration achieves the highest PSNR but also the highest bitrate. On the other hand, the randomaccess configuration achieves a good balance between bitrate and PSNR, obtaining a lower bitrate with better PSNR compared to lowdelay and lowdelay-P for all sequences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. Arianto, â€œPandemi Covid-19 dan Transformasi Budaya Digital di Indonesia,TT, vol. 5, no. 2, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.22437/titian.v5i2.15309.

[2] Z.-N. Li, M. S. Drew, and J. Liu, Fundamentals of Multimedia. in Texts in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-62124-7.

[3] C.-T. Ni, Y.-C. Huang, and P.-Y. Chen, A Hardware-Friendlyand High-Efficiency H.265/HEVC Encoder for Visual Sensor Networks, Sensors, vol. 23, no. 5, p. 2625, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23052625.

[4] A. G. Zakinah, A. Setyanto, and A. Nasiri, Perbandingan Codec AVC Dan HEVC Menggunakan Penilaian Subjektif Standar ITU-T P.900,Indonesia Journal on Computing (Indo-JC), vol. 8, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.34818/INDOJC.2023.8.2.719.

[5] O. U. Ulas and A. M. Tekalp, Flexible luma-chroma bit allocation in learned image compression for high-fidelity sharper images,in 2022 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS), San Jose, CA, USA: IEEE, Dec. 2022, pp. 31“35. doi: 10.1109/PCS56426.2022.10017994.

[6] K. Swaraja, G. Karuna, P. Kora, and K. Meenakshi, Video Watermarking Fundamentals and Overview, in ICICCT 2019 “ System Reliability, Quality Control, Safety, Maintenance and Management, V. K. Gunjan, V. Garcia Diaz, M. Cardona, V. K. Solanki, and K. V. N. Sunitha, Eds., Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020, pp. 379“385. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-8461-5_42.

[7] F. Fathul and R. Purnamasari, Analisis Performansi Video Encoder dan Decoder (CODEC) High Efficiency Video Coding dan Advanced Video Coding pada Video Digital,e-Proceeding of Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 275“280, 2018.

[8] M. H. Idris, â€œAnalisis Performansi Video Kompresi H.265 (HEVC) dan VP9 pada Layanan Video Streaming Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) dari Segi Quality of Service (QOS), e-Proceeding of Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 3510“3517, 2019.

[9] I. Saputra, H. Mukhtar, and J. A. Amien, Analisis Perbandingan Performa Codec H.264 & H.265 Video Streaming Dari Segi Quality of Service,CoSciTech, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9“13, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.37859/coscitech.v2i1.2190.

[10] A. S. Tubagus, R. S. Mahdi, A. Rizal, and A. Suharso, Analisis Perbandingan Teknik Video Codec H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP9 dan AV1,Edumatic, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 187“195, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.29408/edumatic.v5i2.3850.

[11] J. Benjak, D. Hofman, J. Knezovi, and M. ½agar, Performance Comparison of H.264 and H.265 Encoders in a 4K FPV Drone Piloting System, Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 13, p. 6386, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12136386.

[12] G. J. Sullivan, J.-R. Ohm, W.-J. Han, and T. Wiegand, Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard,IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1649“1668, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2012.2221191.

[13] M. Wien, High Efficiency Video Coding: Coding Tools and Specification. in Signals and Communication Technology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44276-0.

[14] W. Menasri and K. Meddah, Low level Syntax Elements Study in Intra HEVC/H.265 Video Codec, in 2022 7th International Conference on Image and Signal Processing and their Applications (ISPA), Mostaganem, Algeria: IEEE, May 2022, pp. 1“7. doi: 10.1109/ISPA54004.2022.9786323.

[15] High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) | HEVC. Accessed: Jan. 09, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://hevc.hhi.fraunhofer.de/

[16] Xiph.org¯:: Derfs Test Media Collection. Accessed: Nov. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://media.xiph.org/video/derf/

[17] A. Antsiferova, A. Yakovenko, N. Safonov, D. Kulikov, A. Gushin, and D. Vatolin, Objective video quality metrics application to video codecs comparisons: choosing the best for subjective quality estimation.arXiv, Jul. 21, 2021. Accessed: Jan. 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.10220

[18] T. Maharani, M. A. Zainuddin, and S. Sukaridhoto, Pengukuran PSNR pada Transmisi Video di Kanal Terahertz menggunakan QAM Modulation,klik, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 154, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.20527/klik.v7i2.319.