ANALYSIS OF OBSOLESCENCE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF AUTHORS USING LOTKA LAW ON THE JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN 2015 – 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24269/pls.v5i1.3783Abstract This research was conducted to determine the level of obsolescence of a literature and determine the author's productivity with the law of lotka in the literature on entrepreneurship in 2015-2019. The research method used is quantitative research methods by conducting citation analysis. In analyzing data, data is collected, submitted, processed and then presented in tables and graphs. The result of the research is the obsolescence level of the literature with an article entitled "The Effect of Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Performance with Service Quality, Satisfaction and Behavior Intention as Antecedents" with the obsolescence of literature and half-life of the last 17 years. And the shortest time for literature obsolescence is only 5 years, the article is entitled: "The Effect of Using Cooperative Learning Type Think-Pair-Share (Tps) on Entrepreneurship Learning Outcomes of Class X Students of Even Semester SMP Kartikatama 1 Metro T.P 2015/2016". Then for the calculation of authors who are often cited, namely I Ghozali, Singh, Sangeeta, Wafa, S.A and Suharti L. Each of the authors of the articles is the writer with the second rank on the subject of entrepreneurship. Most of the writers produce one article. The most productive writer produced 4 articles and got first place, namely Wiliams, then Muhammad Hassan and Berry L were in second place by producing 2 articles in the 2015-2019 period while the third rank was occupied by authors who produced 1 article in the 2015-2019 period, namely as many as 156 authors. Based on the test of Lotka's law on Entrepreneurship articles, it has an exponential value of (n) 3.7537, with the set (C) 0.9127 or 91.27%. From the graph it can be seen that there is a relationship between the number of authors and the number of articles produced as in the lotka law. The fewer the number of writers, the more articles are produced.
References
Anggrainingsih, R. (2011). ANALISA DAN PERANCANGAN SISTEM INFORMASI PENGENDALIAN DOKUMEN UNTUK SISTEM MANAJEMEN MUTU STANDAR ISO 9001. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi & Komunikasi Terapan 2011, 24–31. http://eprints.dinus.ac.id/124/
B. Mustofa. (2010). Obsolescence : Mengenal Konsep Keusangan Literatur dalam Dunia Kepustakawan. IPB. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/
Bayu Indra Saputro. (2011). ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIKA PRODUKTIVITAS PENGARANG ARTIKEL JURNAL BERKALA ARKEOLOGI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN DALIL HUKUM LOTKA. Berkala Arkeologi, 31(1). https://doi.org/DOI 10.30883/jba.v31i1.419
Dewiyana, H. dan F. A. (2010). Produktivitas Pengarang Pada Jurnal Program Studi Di Lingkungan Universitas Sumatera Utara (Usu) Terbitan Usu Press Tahun 2004-2006. Digilib UNSRI. https://digilibunsri.wordpress.com/2010/03/04/produktivitas-pengarang-pada-jurnal-program-studi-di-lingkungan-universitas-sumatera-utara-usu-terbitan-usu-press-tahun-2004-2006-oleh-himma-dewiyana-dan-fitri-arianti/
Farida, M. (2010). Kolaborasi Dan Produktivitas Pengarang Bidang Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi: Studi Kasus Pada Jurnal Online D-Lib Magazine Dan Jurnal Information Research Tahun 2006-2009 [Universitas Sumatera Utara]. http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/18539/Cover.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y
Hasugian, J. (2005). Analisis Sitiran Terhadap Disertasi Program Doktor (S-3) Ilmu Kedokteran Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Pustaha: Jurnal Studi Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 1(2), 1–11. http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/15749/pus-des2005- (1).pdf?sequence=1
Hayati, N. (2016). Analisis Sitiran Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Koleksi Perpustakaan. Jurnal Record And Library Journal, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/rlj.V2-I1.2016.1-15
Hayati, N. dan L. (2017). Produktivitas Dosen Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Pada Jurnal Terindeks Scopus: Suatu Kajian Bibliometrik. Jurnal Al-Maktabah, 16(1), 22–31. http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/al-maktabah/article/view/8084
Hermawan, I. (2019). Teknik Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Hidayatul Qur’an.
Rahmah, E. (2011). Kajian Bibliometrik Menggunakan Analisis Sitiran Terhadap Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia FBS UNP Tahun 2005-2009. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Seni, 12(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/komposisi.v12i2.3916
Rhoni Rodin dan Nur Afifah. (2019). Studi bibliometrika pada abstrak artikel bidang ilmu sosiologi periode 2015-2018. Jurnal JUPITER, XVI(2), 1–30. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jupiter/article/view/12871/6555
Sri Wulan. (2014). Produktivitas dan Tingkat Kolaborasi Penulis Dalam Karya Tulis Ilmiah Peneliti Bidang Zoologi, Puslit Biologi-LIPI 2005-2010. Visi Pustaka, 16(2). https://www.perpusnas.go.id/magazine-detail.php?lang=id&id=8335
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Licence
This Journal will place Author as Copyright Holder, The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
Plagiarism Notice
PUBLIS Editorial board recognizes that plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) upon identification of plagiarism/similarities in articles submitted for publication in PUBLIS. PUBLIS will use Turnitin's originality checking software as the tool in detecting similarities of texts in article manuscripts and the final version articles ready for publication. A maximum of 30% of similarities is allowed for the submitted papers. Should we find more than 30% of the similarity index, the article will be returned to the author for correction and resubmission.