PENTINGNYA PERSONAL DIGITAL ARCHIVE DALAM KEHIDUPAN SEHARI – HARI (THE IMPORTANT OF PERSONAL DIGITAL ARCHIVE IN DAILY ACTIVITY)

Authors

  • Diana Maulida Zakiah Perpustakaan A. Wahid Hasyim Tebuireng Jombang
  • Angela Merry Suciati Perpustakaan Universitas Katolik Widya Karya Malang
  • Moch. Fikriansyah wicaksono IAIN Tulungagung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24269/pls.v4i2.3027

Abstract

Abstract

Personal Digital Archive is one of the important things in daily life, as the purpose of preserving private archives that are mostly produced in digital form. However, some people  tend not to consider it so important, sometimes they end up with missing, corrupted, and inaccessible personal files in that digital form. There will be so many benefits of the private archive preservation in the long term. Good personal digital archive management has a very significant impact on a person, even after the death of that person. This may be useful for future research or inheritance for families after the death. This paper discusses views on how important to manage personal digital archiving in daily life, as well as guidance on how to do personal digital archiving  as a good effort of preservation of personal digital archive for long period of time. It is an easy thing to collect personal digital content, but it will take a lot of time to manage it. The average person can collect hundreds of thousands of emails, digital photos, text messages, audio visual recordings, and other digital files in a lifetime. If the file is not properly managed, it will be difficult to find, identify, and access the content in the future.

 

 

References

Brown, N. (2015). Helping members of the community manage their digital lives: Developing a personal digital archiving workshop. D-Lib Magazine, 21(5/6), 48.
Gasparotto, M. (2015). Personal digital archiving conference, New York University, April 24-26, 2015. Library Hi Tech News, 32(6), 19–21.
Marshall, C. C. (2007). How people manage personal information over a lifetime. Diakses 20 April, 2017, dari http://www.csdl.tamu.edu/~marshall/PIM%20Chapter-Marshall.pdf.
Marshall, C. C. (2008). Rethinking personal digital archiving part 1: Four challenges from the field. D-Lib Magazine, 14(3/4).
Sandy, H. M., Corrado, E. M., dan Ivester, B. B. (2017). Personal digital archiving: An analysis of URLs in the .edu domain. Library Hi Tech, 35(1), 40–52.
Smith, K dan Venlet, J. (2015). Personal digital archiving strategies. Diakses 17 April 2017, darihttp://libraries.mit.edu/digitalarchives/files/2015/10/2015_pda_handoutdissemination-v3.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-01

How to Cite

Zakiah, D. M., Suciati, A. M., & wicaksono, M. F. (2021). PENTINGNYA PERSONAL DIGITAL ARCHIVE DALAM KEHIDUPAN SEHARI – HARI (THE IMPORTANT OF PERSONAL DIGITAL ARCHIVE IN DAILY ACTIVITY). Publication Library and Information Science, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24269/pls.v4i2.3027

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Licence

This Journal will place Author as Copyright Holder, The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 

Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

 

Plagiarism Notice

PUBLIS Editorial board recognizes that plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) upon identification of plagiarism/similarities in articles submitted for publication in PUBLIS. PUBLIS will use Turnitin's originality checking software as the tool in detecting similarities of texts in article manuscripts and the final version articles ready for publication. A maximum of 30% of similarities is allowed for the submitted papers. Should we find more than 30% of the similarity index, the article will be returned to the author for correction and resubmission.