PENERAPAN PASAL 28 AYAT (2) UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DALAM MENANGGULANGI DELIK UJARAN KEBENCIAN DI INTERNET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v6i1.4292Abstrak
Hate speech is an act that is prohibited by law, with the development of technology, information and communication, hate speech is also found on the internet. Regulations regarding hate speech offenses on the internet in Indonesia are formulated in Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions as amended by Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE). However, in its application, Article 28 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law is considered problematic and does not provide legal certainty. Therefore, the problem formulated, namely "How from Article 28 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law in Overcoming Hate Speech Offenses on the Internet". The method used is empirical juridical which is a type of sociological legal research and can be mentioned by field research, which examines the applicable legal provisions and what has occurred in people's lives. The results of this study are the application of Article 28 paragraph (2) of the ITE Law referring to the SKB of the ITE Law which this article is intended for the act of spreading information that causes hatred based on SARA, but does not include a submission of opinions that contains criticism or disagrees, if the perpetrator found guilty will be subject to criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment and fines.
Unduhan
Referensi
Azhar, A. F., & Soponyono, E. (2020). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Pengaturan dan Penanggulangan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) di Media Sosial. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(2), 275–290.
Chang, W. (2018). Etika & Etiket komunikasi (Rahasia Sadap-Menyadap, Ujaran Kebencian, Hoax). Yogyakarta: PT. Kanisius.
Chazawi, A., & Ferdian, A. (2015). Tindak Pidana Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Malang: Media Nusa Creative.
Christianto, H. (2018). Perbuatan Pidana Ujaran Kebencian. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Febriansyah, F. I. (2016). Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila (Dasar Filosofis dan Ideologis Bangsa). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Febriansyah, F. I., Indiantoro, A., & Izziyana, W. V. (2021). The Urgency of the Prenuptial Agreement as an Early Marriage Agreement. In 1st International Conference Of Education, Social And Humanities (INCESH 2021) (pp. 149–155). Atlantis Press.
Febriansyah, F. I., & Purwinarto, H. S. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial. Jurnal De Jure, 20(2), 177–188.
Margono. (2019). Asas Keadilan Kemanfaatan & Kepastian Hukum Dalam Putusan Hakim. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Mauladi, S. (2018). Seri Cerdas Hukum: Awas Hoax. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Mauludi, S. (2018). Awas hoax! : cerdas menghadapi pencemaran nama baik, ujaran kebencian dan hoax/ Mauludi. Jakarta: Kompas.
Peraturan Pemerintah RI. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 251, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5952). (2016).
Rahayu. (2010). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Sitompul, J. (2021). Pasal untuk Menjerat Penyebar Kebencian SARA di Jejaring Sosial. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt4fb9207f1726f/interprestasi-pasal-28-ayat-2-undang-undang-no-11-tahun-2008-tentang-informasi-transaksi-elektronik/
Soekanto, S. (1986). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia (UI Perss).
Sugeng. (2020). Hukum Telematika Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi

Legal Standing : (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
.png)