Covid-19 Vaccination in News Construction kompas.com and cnbc.com

Eli Purwati* -  Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo., Indonesia
Ayub Dwi Anggoro -  Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo., Indonesia
Krisna Megantari -  Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo., Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v10i1.4163

The dynamics of handling COVID-19 in Indonesia is entering a new phase, namely vaccination. There is a phenomenon that is widely discussed in the community about the pros and cons of the effectiveness of the Sinovac and AstraZeneca vaccines. The media skillfully writes various news points of view related to government policies in terms of vaccination. In this case, the news delivered by kompas.com media on March 10, 2021 and cnbcindonesia.com on March 9, 2021 about the efficacy of vaccination is interesting to study.  The two media frame the Vaccine news differently, The objective of this study is to compare the news content of the two media. This study applies a qualitative approach and Robert Etmant's framing analysis model. According to the results of research on news at kompas.com, the elaboration of the explanation about the AstraZeneca vaccine is so complete and detailed, but it is in contrast to the explanation elaborated on the Sinovac vaccine. On the other hand, in the news on cnbcindonesia.com, the elaboration on the use of technology is described in a balanced way. It was concluded that kompas.com wrote a balanced report on the information process while cnbcindonesia.com wrote it in a balanced way in the information process.
Keywords
News, Framing, vaccination Covid-19
  1. Anggoro, A. D. (2014). MEDIA, POLITIK dan KEKUASAAN (Analisis Framing Model Robert N. Entman tentang pemberitaan hasil pemilihan Presiden, 9 Juli 2014 di TV One dan Metro TV ). Aristo, 2(2), 25-58
  2. Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1990). The Social Construction of Reality, A Treatise in the Sociological of Knowledge, Penerj. Hasan Basri. Jakarta. LP3ES.
  3. Bungin, B. H. (2006). Sosiologi komunikasi: Teori, paradigma, dan diskursus teknologi komunikasi di masyarakat. Language, 19(395p), 24cm.
  4. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage publications.
  5. Dewi, S. A. (2021). KOMUNIKASI PUBLIK TERKAIT VAKSINASI COVID 19. Health Care : Jurnal Kesehatan, 162-167.
  6. Durham, F. D. (2001). Breaching powerful boundaries: A postmodern critique of framing. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (123-138). Mahwah, New Jwersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis isi: Pengantar metodologi untuk penelitian ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu-ilmu sosial lainnya. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  8. Hill, D. T. (1995). The Press in New Order Indonesia, rev. Edn. Jakarta: PT Pustaka Sinar Harapan.(1990)‘Publishing within Political Parameters’, Inside Indonesia, 23, 16–17.
  9. Junaedi, F. (2014). Jurnalisme penyiaran dan reportase televisi. Kencana.
  10. McNair, B. (2017). An introduction to political communication. Taylor & Francis.
  11. Mulyana, D. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Cet. 1. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  12. Mursito, B. M. (2012). Realitas Media. Solo: Smart Media.
  13. Sobur, A. (2009). Psikologi Umum (cetakan II). Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
  14. Sobur, A. (2011). Psikologi Umum, CV. Pustaka Setia, Bandung.
  15. Sukmono, F. G., & Junaedi, F. (2018). Menggagas Jurnalisme Optimis dalam Pemberitaan tentang Bencana. Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI, 15(1), 107-120

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2021-10-06
Published: 2022-03-07
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: