Shifts of Voter Behavior in the Election of Local Head and Their Impact on the Implementation of Government in Nabire District 2020 – 2022

Mariana Tresia Sawaki* -  Government Science Postgraduate Study Program, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Franciscus Van Yist -  Padjadjaran University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, Indonesia
Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa -  Padjadjaran University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v10i3.6075

The purposes of this study (1) are to analyze why the electronic performance reporting of the work unit at the Nabire Regency Secretariat causes the performance of the local government to be unable to meet the real needs of the region; (2) To analyze why the filling of structural positions in the Nabire Regency Secretariat does not prioritize service to the community. The research uses a qualitative approach through the process of finding, understanding, explaining and obtaining an overview. The result is that Electronic Performance Reporting in several Work Units at the Nabire Regency Secretary has not fully referred to the symbolic policy model, and the filling of structural positions in the Nabire Regency Secretariat has not prioritized service to the community because it has not referred to the procedural policy model.

Keywords
Regent Policy Implementation; Regional Head; Filling Structural Positions; Regional Secretariat;
  1. Abdul Wahab, Solichin (2008). Analisis Kebijaksaan Dari Formulasi Ke Implementasi Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  2. Agustino, Leo. (2008). Politik dan Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: AIPI Bandung dan Puslit KP2W Lemlit UNPAD.
  3. Anton O. Zakharov. (2009). Constructing the polity of Sriwijaya in the 7th-8th centuries: The view according to the inscriptions. Indonesian Studies Working Papers, No. 9, juillet 2009
  4. Anugrah E. Yogyantoro. (2015). Lelang Jabatan: Penerapan Good Governance dalam Birokrasi. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia Manajemen Situs Kemenkeu: www.kemenkeu.go.id.
  5. Arifin Zainal. (2011). Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda.
  6. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  7. Barnard, Chester J, (1988). The Function of Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge USA
  8. Bratakusumah dan Solihin (2002). Otonomi Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah. Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  9. Bucek dalam kutipan Harahap, Sofyan Syafri. (2016). Analisis Kritis Laporan Keuangan. Jakata: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
  10. Bungin Burhan. (2007). Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik dan Ilmu Sosial lainnya. Jakarta:Putra Grafika
  11. Busthan Abdy. (2016). Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan. Kupang: Desna Life Ministry
  12. David Orborne, dan Ted Gaebler. (1993). Reinventing Government. New York: Plume
  13. Dessler, Gary. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  14. Dewandaru, Dimas Sigit. (2013). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi E-Office Untuk Mendukung Penerapan E-Government Dalam Kegiatan Perkantoran Studi Kasus: Puslitbang Jalan Dan Jembatan. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi 2013 (SENTIKA 2013) ISSN: 2089-9815 Yogyakarta, 9 Maret 2013, 232-239.
  15. Dian Bakti Setiawan, 2011, Pemberhentian Kepala Daerah; Mekanisme Pemberhentiannya Menurut Sistem Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
  16. Dye, Thomas R. (2017). Understanding public policy. ISBN 978-0-13-416997-2. OCLC 982957256. Pearson Boston
  17. E. Mulyasa. (2013). Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan, Jakarta, Bumi Aksara.
  18. Flynn, Norman. (1977). Public Sector Management, 3rd Edition. London: Prentice Hall
  19. Gortner Harold. F. (1984). Administration in The Public Sector. New York: Jhon Willy
  20. Grindle, Merilee S. (Ed). (1980). Politics and Apolicy Implementation in the Third World. New Jersey: Princetown University Press.
  21. Heinz Weihrich and Haroid Koontz. (1993). Management A.Global Perspective. Tent Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc
  22. Hogwood, Brian W., and Gunn, Lewis A. (1986). Policy Analysis for the Real World. Oxford University Press
  23. Lincoln dan Guba (1985). Naturalistic Inqury. California: Sage
  24. M. Mas’ud Said. (2007). Birokrasi Di Negara Birokratis. Malang: UMM Press
  25. Moleong, Lexy J (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung; PT Remaja Rosda Karya
  26. Republik Indonesia, “Undang-Undang No. 43 tahun 1999 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang No. 8 tahun 1974 tentang Pokok-Pokok Kepegawaian”.
  27. Republik Indonesia, “Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 13 tahun 2014 tentang Tata Cara Pengisian Jabatan Tinggi Secara Terbuka Di Lingkungan Instansi Pemerintah”
  28. Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.
  29. Sugiyono (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  30. Straling Grover. (1979). The Politics and Economy of Public Policy: An Introductory Analysis with Case. New York: The Dorsey Press
  31. Stokey Edith & Zekhauser Richard. (1978). A Primer for Policy Analysis. New York: W.W Norton & Company
  32. Tarigan Antonius (2000). Artikulasi Konsep Implementaasi Kebijakan: Perspektif Model dan Kriteria Pengukurannya. Jurnal
  33. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2022-11-03
Published: 2022-12-19
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: