Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pendidikan Dasar

Muhammad Abdullah* -  STKIP Muhammadiyah Kalabahi, Alor, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia
Yakin Akbar Asikin -  STKIP Muhammadiyah Kalabahi, Alor, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia
Irawati Sabanja -  STKIP Muhammadiyah Kalabahi, Alor, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ajbe.v6i1.5048

This study aims to determine the implementation of the STAD type cooperative learning model in improving the learning outcomes of basic education students. This study uses classroom action research with 15 students as subjects of Class IV SD Negeri Sebanjar, Alor Village, Northwest Alor District, East Nusa Tenggara, consisting of 7 males and 8 females. This research was carried out in two cycles, and each cycle was carried out in 3 meetings including tests at the end of each cycle. Data collection was carried out using learning outcomes tests at the end of each cycle, observation sheets for teacher and student activities carried out during the learning process and student response questionnaires. The collected data was then analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. The results of this classroom action research analysis found that the implementation of the STAD Type Cooperative learning model for two cycles has been able to improve the learning outcomes of Class IV students at SD Negeri Sebanjar, Alor Village, Alor Barat Laut Subdistrict, East Nusa Tenggara, which is reflected in several aspects, including: (a) the increase in student learning outcomes, this can be seen from the increase in the average total percentage of learning outcomes, namely in the first cycle by 60% and in the fairly good category, increasing in the second cycle to 86.7% and in the very category good; (b) an increase in the activity of teachers and students in the learning process in accordance with the results of observations made during the study. for teacher activity, namely in the first cycle the average percentage of teacher activity was 77.8% and in the second cycle it increased to 90.3%. for student activities, namely in the first cycle the average percentage of student activity was 74% and in the second cycle it increased to 91.7%; and (c) students gave a positive response to the implementation of the STAD type cooperative learning model with an average total percentage of 100%.
Keywords
Learning Outcomes; Learning Model; STAD Type Cooperative; Elementary School
  1. Abidin, N., & Arifin, S. (2021, January). Arabic Language Learning Design Through Smart Apps Creator Applications. In 1st International Conference Of Education, Social And Humanities (INCESH 2021) (pp. 283-287). Atlantis Press.
  2. Alma, B. (2010). Guru Profesional (Menguasai Metode dan Terampil Mengajar). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  3. Al-Tabany, T & Badar, I. (2014). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  4. Arifin, S., Abidin, N., & Al Anshori, F. (2021). Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar dan Implikasinya terhadap Pengembangan Desain Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Dirasat: Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 65-78.
  5. Arifin, S., & Setiyono, T. (2018, August). Urgensi Controlling Dan Evaluasi Dalam Mengembangkan Tenaga Kependidikan Lembaga Pendidikan Islam Di Era Milenial. In International Seminar On Islamic Education.
  6. Arikunto, S., Suhardjono., Supardi. (2010). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  7. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rikena Cipta
  8. Ariyanto, A. (2020). Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Pembelajaran Matematika melalui Pendekatan Reciprocal Teaching Kelas VII Semester Gasal SMP Muhammadiyah 10 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020.
  9. Danim, S. (2011). Pengantar Kependidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  10. Fadhli, M., Sukirman, S., Ulfa, S., Susanto, H., & Syam, A. R. (2022). Gamifying Children's Linguistic Intelligence With the Duolingo App: A Case Study From Indonesia. In Research Anthology on Developments in Gamification and Game-Based Learning (pp. 1402-1415). IGI Global.
  11. Hamdani. (2011). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
  12. Hamzah, A., & Muhlisrarini. (2014). Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
  13. Heruman. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Matematika Di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  14. Koriati, E. D., Syam, A. R., & Ariyanto, A. (2021). Upaya Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesionalisme Guru Pendidikan Dasar Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Of Basic Education, 5(2), 85-95.
  15. Mulyasa, E. (2011). Menjadi Guru Profesional menciptakan pembelajaran kreatif dan menyenangkan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  16. Nurjan, S., & Syam, A. R. (2021). Peningkatan Keaktifan Dan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Pai Dengan Penerapan Metode Card Sort Di Sdn 2 Sanan Wonogiri:-. Al Kamal, 1(1), 43-63.
  17. Praniyati, Nita. (2010). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams-Achievement Divisions (STAD) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menghitung Pecahan pada Siswa Kelas V SDN 01 Macanan Tahun Pelajaran 2009/2010. Solo: UNS.
  18. Rusman. (2012). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
  19. Setiawan, R., Susanto, H., & Ariyanto, A. (2019). Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Snowball Throwing pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Energi Bunyi Kelas IV SDN II Pule Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Tarbawi: Journal on Islamic Education, 3(1), 39-46.
  20. Setyosari, P. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengembangan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  21. Shoimin, A. (2014). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
  22. Sugiono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif, dan R dan D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  23. Sumaryanti, L., Syam, A. R., & Syukroni, A. (2020). Urgency of implementing adab for students of elementary school in the perspective of the Qur’an and hadith. AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Of Basic Education, 5(1), 1-12.
  24. Suprijono, A. (2012). Cooperative Learning Teori & Aplikasi Pakem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  25. Syam, A. R., & Arifin, S. (2019, June). Quality of Educational Services in Islam Perspective. In WESTECH 2018: Proceedings of 1st Workshop on Environmental Science, Society, and Technology, WESTECH 2018, December 8th, 2018, Medan, Indonesia (p. 439). European Alliance for Innovation.
  26. Syam, A. R., & Mukhlas, M. (2019). The Role of The Security Department In Regulating The Discipline of Members of Student Organizations in Darussalam Gontor Modern Islamic Institution. At-Ta'dib, 14(1), 90-104.
  27. Ummah, K., Susanto, H., & Ariyanto, A. (2021). Implementasi Srategi Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Belajar Mengaji Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Di Tk Inklusi Pas Baitul Qur’an Ngabar Ponorogo. Tarbawi: Journal on Islamic Education, 38-49.
  28. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Jakarta: Cemerlang.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2022-03-18
Published: 2021-12-24
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: