JAMINAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS ATAS KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA DAN BERKEYAKINAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i3.9830Abstract
This paper aims to provide an analytical comparison of the constitutions of Malaysia, the United States, Germany, and Indonesia, with a particular emphasis on the relationship between religion and belief as stated in their respective constitutional texts. The determination of the four countries above depends on a number of factors, including their legal systems, their level of development, the actors of a nation's attachment, and the state's secularism towards religion and belief. This writing uses a normative legal research method with a comparative approach and a legislative approach. Literature studies are used to collect legal materials and are carried out through searches in libraries and through the Internet. The interpretation method is used to analyze legal materials to understand the meaning of a statutory text. The findings of this study indicate that by establishing general and comprehensive guidelines regarding religion and belief in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and maintaining impartiality towards all religions, Indonesia is sufficient to regulate religious and belief affairs within the framework of its constitution. Therefore, it is very important to implement legislative steps to foster a harmonious and peaceful religious life while eradicating the fundamental causes of blasphemy, as well as intolerance and discrimination in the context of religious beliefs and practices.
References
Australian Human Rights Commision. (n.d.). Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion or Belief. Retrieved May 17, 2024, from https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/rights-and-freedoms/freedom-thought-conscience-and-religion-or-belief
Berger, E. (2023, August 8). The German Legal System. The Leibnis Institute of European History.
Bielefeldt, H., & Wiener, M. (n.d.). Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief General Assembly Resolution 36/55. Audiovisual Library of International Law. Retrieved May 17, 2024, from https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/ga_36-55/ga_36-55.html
Colbran, N. (2010). Kebebasan Beragama atau Berkeyakinan: Seberapa Jauh?; Kebebasan Beragama atau Berkeyakinan di Indonesia : Jaminan Normatif dan Pelaksanaannya Dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara (T. Lindholm, Ed.). Kanisius.
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. (n.d.). Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community.
Constitution of the United States. (n.d.). United States Senate. Retrieved April 30, 2024, from https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm
Cornell Law School. (n.d.). First Amendment. Retrieved May 4, 2024, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/first_amendment
Deutscland.de. (2024, March 27). Five Facts about State and Religion. https://www.deutschland.de/en/topic/politics/state-and-religion-in-germany-the-five-most-important-facts
Fenoria, F. (2023, July 21). Malaysia, Negara Multi Etnis dan Multi Agama. Universitas Airlangga. https://unair.ac.id/post_fetcher/fakultas-kedokteran-hewan-malaysia-negara-multi-etnis-dan-multi-agama/#:~:text=Malaysia%20adalah%20negara%20dengan%20mayoritas,pernah%20terdengar%20perseteruan%20antar%20etnis.
Gaffar, J. M. (2012). Demokrasi Konstitusional: Praktik Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Konstitusi Press.
Leppert, R., & Fahmy, D. (2022, July 5). 10 facts about religion and government in the United States. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/07/05/10-facts-about-religion-and-government-in-the-united-states/
Marzuki, M. L. (2010). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(4), 1–7.
Marzuki, P. M. (2018). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Vol. Cetakan Ke-11. Kencana.
Mubarok, N. (2021). Sistem Pemerintahan di Negara-Negara Rumpun Melayu. SOSIO YUSTISIA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perubahan Sosial, 1(1), 126–155.
Nastiti, T. S. (2014). Jejak-jejak Peradaban Hindu-Buddha di Nusantara. Kalpataru: Majalah Arkeologi, 23(1), 35–50.
Office of the HIgh Commisioner for Human Rights. (2018, November 27). Universal Declaration of Human Rights at 70: 30 Articles on 30 Articles - Article 18. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2018/11/universal-declaration-human-rights-70-30-articles-30-articles-article-18
Omara, A. (2024). Why Not Indonesia an Islamic State? Constitutional Debate Concerning Religion-State Relation in A Muslim Majority Country. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(1), 421. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.15889
Sadzali, A. (2018). Relasi Agama dan Negara. Pusat Studi Hukum Islam Fakultas Hukum UII.
Sahidah, A. (2011). Islam dan Demokrasi di Malaysia. Millah, X(2), 213–226.
Santoso, G., Karim, A. A., Maftuh, B., Sapriya, & Murod, M. (2023). Kajian Konstitusi di Indonesia: Kembali pada UUD 1945 Asli atau Tetap dalam UUD NRI 1945 di Abad 21 . Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif, 2(1), 257–269.
Smith, D. E. (1985). Agama dan Modernisasi Politik: Suatu Kajian Analitis. CV Rajawali.
the World Conference on Human Rights in Vienna. (n.d.). Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. United Nation Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. Retrieved May 17, 2024, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/vienna-declaration-and-programme-action
Yusuf, N., Setyawan, H., Immawati, S., Santoso, G., & Usman, M. (2022). Pengembangan Media Flipbook Berbasis Fabel untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Pesan Moral pada Peserta Didik Kelas Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 8314–8330. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3735
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Legal Standing : (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
.png)
