PLEA BARGAINING DALAM RANCANGAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA NEGARA INDONESIA

Authors

  • Alimuddin Alimuddin Universitas Megarezky
  • Muh Zuhud Al-Khaer Zahir Universitas Megarezky
  • Muh Firdaus Rasyid Universitas Andi Djemma
  • Muh Fichriyadi Hastira Universitas Mulawarman https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7564-1003

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i2.9213

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the legal political structure and the level of urgency of the Plea Bargaining System in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code. Normative legal research is the type of research used. The study of legal issues relating to norms is emphasized in legal research techniques. This method will concentrate on looking at legal reality from the point of view of the legal substance that regulates and is still developing. The findings of this study indicate that the Plea Bargaining system in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code is needed. This is indicated by the fact that several countries, such as Germany and France, have successfully implemented similar systems with various models and techniques. However, the Plea Bargaining system in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code does not use these strategies, but rather emphasizes that Plea Bargaining is only to alleviate the charges and accelerate the trial process. Plea Bargaining is expected to accelerate the legal process by reducing the volume of cases brought to court, saving time and money, compensating defendants who admit their guilt, and meeting the needs of the public prosecutor and defendants. With the establishment of the Special Track, Article 199 of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code describes the form of the Plea Bargaining system in its application and offers the idea of a Plea Bargaining system with a maximum penalty of 7 years as one of the options in accelerating case settlement. The use of Plea Bargaining has several advantages as follows: one, it reduces the accumulation of cases in court; two, it provides relief for defendants who admit their guilt; and the third simplifies the process for public prosecutors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab Aziz, N., Mohamad Amin, N., & Ab Hamid, Z. (2017). Enhancing plea bargaining process through mediation. IJASOS- International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 306–306. https://doi.org/10.18769/ijasos.320064
Berg, N., & Kim, J.-Y. (2018). Plea bargaining with multiple defendants and its deterrence effect. International Review of Law and Economics, 55, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2018.04.002
Clatch, L., & Borgida, E. (2021). Plea Bargaining: A Test of Dual Discounting Preferences for Non-Monetary Losses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(7), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220952228
CR-28. (2021). Mengenal Plea Bargaining dalam RKUHAP Sebagai Solusi Peradilan Cepat. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengenal-plea-bargaining-dalam-rkuhap-sebagai-solusi-peradilan-cepat-lt61c066aa5a7a3/
Ervo, L. (2021). Plea Bargaining Changing Nordic Criminal Procedure: Sweden and Finland as Examples (pp. 255–269). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74851-7_14
Gormley, J. (2022). The inefficiency of plea bargaining. Journal of Law and Society, 49(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12360
Guha, B. (2024). Plea bargaining when juror effort is costly. Economic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-024-01551-2
Helm, R. K., & Reyna, V. F. (2017). Logical but incompetent plea decisions: A new approach to plea bargaining grounded in cognitive theory. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000125
Hodgson, J. (2015). Plea Bargaining: A Comparative Analysis. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 226–231). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86091-2
Jenia, T. I. (2019). Plea Bargaining Across Borders. Aspen Publishers.
Lippke, R. L. (2006). Retributivism and Plea Bargaining. Criminal Justice Ethics, 25(2), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2006.9992198
Lumbantobing, A. P., Sitepu, S., & Herlambang. (2023). Comparison Of Plea Bargaining In The United States With “Special Line” In The Draft Book Of Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) In Indonesia. Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(2), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v13i2.31572
Mahendra, I. I. M. A. (2017). Penguatan Kejaksaan Dalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana Melalui Ple Bargaining. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar. http://www.hukumonline.com/index.php/b
Manab, S. N. binti A., Nasrul, M. A. bin D., & Jaiman, C. U. S. binti. (2018). Plea Bargaining Process In Malaysia. 261–266. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.03.25
Maulana, A. (2015). Konsep Pengakuan Bersalah Terdakwa Pada “Jalur Khusus” Menurut RUU KUHAP dan Perbandingannya Dengan Praktek Plea Bargaining di Beberapa Negara. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 3(1), 39–66.
Miceli, T. J. (2019). Plea Bargaining: Negotiated Justice. In The Paradox of Punishment (Vol. 37, Issue 2, pp. 97–117). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31695-2_5
Miller, R. B. (2020). The Epistemology of Plea Bargaining. Social Epistemology, 34(5), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2020.1737888
Nasution, B. J. (2016). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Nursobah, A. (2022). Beban Perkara MA Periode Januari-Juli 2022 Meningkat 54,70%. News Letter Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/registry-news/2089-beban-perkara-ma-periode-januari-juli-2022-meningkat-54-70
Okafor, P. A. W., Warren, P. Y., & Stewart, E. A. (2022). Plea Bargaining and Trial Decisions in Context: An Examination of Disparities in Punishment. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 38(4), 432–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862221111013
Ščerba, F. (2013). The Concept of Plea Bargaining Under the Czech Criminal Law and the Criminal Law of Other Countries Within the Region of Central Europe. International and Comparative Law Review, 13(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/iclr-2016-0055
Siregar, N. O. (2019). Plea Bargaining dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Beberapa Negara. Wajah Hukum, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v3i1.46
Slobogin, C. (2015). Plea Bargaining and the Substantive and Procedural Goals of Criminal Justice: From Retribution and Adversarialism to Preventive Justice and Hybrid-Inquisitorialism. William & Mary Law Review, 57(4), 1505. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2583898
Syed, S. A. (2020). Plea Bargain In White-Collar Crimes: An Argumentative Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 11(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.46568/pjass.v11i1.437
Uzlău, A. (2013). Plea Bargaining – A New Criminal Procedure Institution. Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v7i4.836
Wilford, M. M., Wells, G. L., & Frazier, A. (2021). Plea-Bargaining Law: the Impact of Innocence, Trial Penalty, and Conviction Probability on Plea Outcomes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(3), 554–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09564-y
Xiaohua, Y. (2016). Plea Bargaining in Criminal Dispute Settlement. Social Sciences in China, 37(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2016.1162022

Downloads

Published

2024-06-04

How to Cite

Alimuddin, A., Zahir, M. Z. A.-K., Rasyid, M. F., & Hastira, M. F. (2024). PLEA BARGAINING DALAM RANCANGAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA NEGARA INDONESIA. Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 418–430. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i2.9213

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Mei-Agustus

Section

Articles

License

Lisensi Creative Commons
Legal Standing : (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum) is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.