MODEL KEJAHATAN DUNIA MAYA (CYBERCRIME) SEBAGAI UPAYA PEMBENTUKAN HUKUM NASIONAL

Ferry Irawan Febriansyah* -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Alfalachu Indiantoro -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia
Afiful Ikhwan -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v7i2.6878

The purpose of this study is to analyze models of cybercrime, namely cybercrime, in order to find out how far the development of forms of crime, whose modus operandi is increasing day by day. The virtual world is part of people's lives so that it cannot be separated from needs. This will later give rise to many new crime models, so that people will be disadvantaged in carrying out activities in cyberspace. This research analysis focuses on empirical legal analysis, namely looking at the social symptoms of people in cyberspace (Internet) in carrying out their daily activities which are vulnerable to crime. The problem that often occurs that is often experienced by the community is education about cyberspace so that they are vulnerable as perpetrators of Cybercrime crimes. This research is very interesting to do along with technological developments, human attitudes and behavior have changed a lot so that new models of crime have emerged in cyberspace.

Keywords
Model Kejahatan, Dunia maya, Cybercrime, Internet.
  1. Abidin, D. Z. (2017). Kejahatan dalam Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Jurnal Processor, 10(2), 509–516.
  2. Adiyanta, F. C. S. (2019). Hukum dan Studi Penelitian Empiris: Penggunaan Metode Survey sebagai Instrumen Penelitian Hukum Empiris. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(4), 697–709.
  3. Amarini, I. (2018). Pencegahan Dampak Negatif Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Pengguna Internet. Kosmik Hukum, 18(1), 1–17.
  4. Anggara, B., & Darmadha, I. N. (2016). Penegakan Hukum Kejahatan Dunia Maya (Cybercrime) Yang Dilakukan Anak Di Bawah Umur. Kertha Wicara : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 5(5), 1–5.
  5. Antoni. (2018). Kejahatan Dunia Maya (Cyber Crime) Dalam Simak Online. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 17(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v17i2.1192
  6. Arief, B. N. (2006). Tindak Pidana Mayantara Perkembangan Kajian Cyber Crime di Indoensia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  7. Arief, H. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LKIS Pelangi Aksara.
  8. Asikin, Z. (2016). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum.
  9. Brands, J., & Van Doorn, J. (2022). The Measurement, Intensity and Determinants of Fear of Cybercrime: A Systematic Review. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107082. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2021.107082
  10. Bunga, D. (2019). Politik Hukum Pidana Terhadap Penanggulangan Cybercrime. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(1), 1–15.
  11. Danuri, M., & Suharnawi. (2017). Trend Cyber Crime Dan Teknologi Informasi Di Indonesia, 13(2), 55–65.
  12. Ferdina, V. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelecehan Seksual Melalui Teknologi Informasi (Cyber) Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 4(2), 89–101.
  13. Fuady, M. (2005). “Cybercrime”: Fenomena Kejahatan melalui Internet di Indonesia. Mediator, 6(2), 255–264.
  14. Hadi, S. P., Hamdani, R. S., & Roziqin, A. (2023). A Sustainability Review on the Indonesian Job Creation Law. Heliyon, 9(2), e13431. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E13431
  15. Handayani, P. (2013). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cyber Crime). Jurnal Dimensi, 2(2).
  16. Hapsari, D., Saptono, H., & Widanarti, H. (2019). Kedudukan E-Commerce Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Diponegoro Law Journal, 8(1), 211–223.
  17. Ikhwan, A. (2021). Metode Penelitian Dasar (Mengenal Model Penelitian dan Sistematikanya). Tulungagung: STAI Muhammadiyah Tulungagung.
  18. Kemp, S. (2023). Exploring Public Cybercrime Prevention Campaigns and Victimization of Businesses: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach. Computers & Security, 127, 103089. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSE.2022.103089
  19. Ketaren, E. (2017). Cybercrime, Cyber Space, dan Cyber Law. JTM : Jurnal TIMES, 5(2), 35–42.
  20. Kristiyono, J. (2015). Budaya Internet: Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Dalam Mendukung Penggunaan Media Di Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmiah Scriptura, 5(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9744/scriptura.5.1.23-30
  21. Kurniawan, F. N. W. (2020). Optimalisasi Bantuan Hukum Demi Terwujudnya Keadilan bagi Rakyat Miskin (Studi Kasus Hak Terdakwa Yang Tidak Mampu dari Segi Ekonomi untuk Memperoleh Bantuan Hukum Terhadap Kejahatan yang Dilakukannya dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana). The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence, 1(2), 105–132.
  22. McCoy, M. (2018). Introduction to Criminal Investigation. Cybercrime, 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781439897485-21
  23. Noerhadi, C. C. (2022). Cybercrimes and Alternative Settlement of Intellectual Property (IPR) Disputes in Indonesia. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 16(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4766558
  24. Setiawan, D. A. (2018). Perkembangan Modus Operandi Kejahatan Skimming Dalam Pembobolan Mesin Atm Bank Sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan Dunia Maya (Cybercrime). Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 16(2), 174–191.
  25. Sinaga, O. (2010). Penanggulangan kejahatan Internasional cyber crime di Indonesia. Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung.
  26. Soraya, B. A., Permatasari, D. A., & Yukamujrisa, N. (2013). Peran Hukum Dalam Menghadapi Perubahan Sosial Dan Kejahatan Dunia Maya. PARENTAL, 1(1).
  27. Sudarwanto, A. S. (2009). Cyber-Bullying Kejahatan Dunia Maya Yang Terlupakan. Jurnal Hukum PRO JUSTITIA, 27(1), 1–16.
  28. Suntana, I., & Priatna, T. (2023). Four Obstacles to the Quality of Constitutional Law Learning in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(1), e12824. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E12824
  29. Toni. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Terhadap Hukuman Pengguna Media Sosial Ujaran Kebencian. Jurnal Informatika, 8(2), 85–88.
  30. Tripa, S. (2019). Rekonseptualisasi Hukum Indonesia. Aceh: Bandar Publishing.
  31. Wilimantara, M. P., Diantha, I. M. P., & Arsika, I. M. B. (2016). Penghancuran Benda Budaya (Iconoclast) Sebagai Kejahatan Terhadap Kemanusiaan. Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 4(5), 1–6.
  32. Wissink, I. B., Standaert, J. C. A., Stams, G. J. J. M., Asscher, J. J., & Assink, M. (2023). Risk Factors for Juvenile Cybercrime: A Meta-Analytic Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 101836. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2023.101836
  33. Yani, A. (2007). Menguak Cybercrime (Kejahatan di Dunia Maya). Paradigma, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.31294/p.v9i2.1152

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2023-03-16
Published: 2023-04-04
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: