PENERAPAN PUTUSAN SELA DI PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DALAM PERKARA PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA PASCA BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020

Chamdani Chamdani* -  Universitas Wijaya Putra, Indonesia
Budi Endarto -  Universitas Wijaya Putra, Indonesia
Sekaring Ayumeida Kusnadi -  Universitas Wijaya Putra, Indonesia
Nobella Indradjaja -  Universitas Wijaya Putra, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v6i2.5516

Almost all of the employers who terminate the employment relationship of their workers terminate their rights and obligations as employers to the workers concerned because they are no longer responsible or have ended their employment relationship with the work so that their rights and obligations are also cut off, including the decision on termination of employment determined by the entrepreneur. The purpose of this study is to analyze and determine the form of obligations of workers and employers that must be carried out during disputes over the termination of employment and to analyze the application of decisions between cases of termination of work after the enactment of Law no. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. This research is a normative legal research or document or literature study carried out or aimed only at Article 96 of Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Disputes and Chapter IV Manpower Article 81 of Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. The interlocutory decision, as referred to in Article 96 paragraph (1) of Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes, is an interlocutory decision with the type of Interlocutor decision. Still, in its application, it is often referred to as a provisional decision and the wages granted in the interlocutory decision are called the regulated suspension wages. In the provisions of article 81, number 46 of Law no. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, namely Article 157A paragraph (2) of Law no. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower.

Keywords
Perselisihan, Putusan Sela, Skorsing, Upah Proses
  1. Asmar, L. (2014). Problematika Independensi Hakim Agung. Koran Waspada, pp. 1–7.
  2. Asnawi, M. N. (2016). Hukum Acara Perdata (Teori,Praktik dan Permasalahannya di Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Agama) (Cet.Pertam). UII Press.
  3. Buruh Online. (2015, April). Tak Terima di-PHK Dengan SMS, PHI Menangkan Buruh. Buruh Online.
  4. Buruh Online. (2019). Pemberitahuan PHK Lewat WhatsApp, Pekerja Tuntut Pesangon. Buruh Online.
  5. Chamdani, Endarto, B., Kusnadi, S. A., Indrajaja, N., & Syafii. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja/Buruh Yang Putus Hubungan Kerja Sebelum Masa Kontrak Kerja Berakhir. Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 4(1).
  6. Channel, A. (2020). Pemberitahuan PHK dari PT.SHYANG YAO FUNG kepada karyawan.
  7. Febriansyah, F. I. (2016). Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila (Dasar Filosofis dan Ideologis Bangsa). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
  8. Febriansyah, F. I., Indiantoro, A., & Izziyana, W. V. (2021). The Urgency of the Prenuptial Agreement as an Early Marriage Agreement. 1st International Conference Of Education, Social And Humanities (INCESH 2021), 149–155. Atlantis Press.
  9. Febriansyah, F. I., & Purwinarto, H. S. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial. Jurnal De Jure, 20(2), 177–188.
  10. Harahap, Y. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata (Ke-2). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  11. Juanda, P. (2011). Putusan MK dan Ragam Tafsir tentang Upah Proses PHK.
  12. Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Agung RI. (2022). Direktori Putusan MARI.
  13. Mahkamah Agung RI. Putusan PHI Surabaya No. 97/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN Sby. , (2019).
  14. Mertokusumo, S. (1998). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia.
  15. Nadia Kemala Movanita, A. (2015). Jimly : Jangan dipertentangkan antara SEMA dan Putusan MK.
  16. Pracelia, Y., & Yurikosari, A. (2019). Analisis Putusan Sela Terhadap Permohonan Pembayaran Upah Proses Dalam Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (Studi Putusan: Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Nomor: 181/PDT.SUS-PHI/2016/PN.BDG jo Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Nomor: 82/PDT.SUS-PHI. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 2, 124. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5184
  17. Rasaid, N. (2003). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  18. Soepomo, R. (1993). Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Negeri. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
  19. Syafi’i. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Perlindungan Jaminan Sosial Terhadap Pekerja Yang Dalam Sengketa Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Menurut Peraturan Presiden Nomor 82 Tahun 2018 Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020. Universitas Wijaya Putra.
  20. Wikipedia. (2022). Hak.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2022-07-12
Published: 2022-09-09
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: