Aset Digital sebagai Objek Jaminan Kebendaan dalam Sistem Hukum Jaminan: Analisis Kepastian Hukum dan Reformulasi Pengaturan Berbasis Perbandingan Hukum

Authors

  • Darojatun Andara Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
  • Tias Antasyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
  • Uyun Raih Restu Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v10i2.14265

Keywords:

Digital Assets, Security Rights, Legal Certainty, Legal Reformulation, Comparative Law

Abstract

The use of digital assets as collateral in financing transactions raises legal issues concerning asset eligibility as an object of proprietary rights, the creation and publicity of security interests, creditor priority, and enforcement. In Indonesia, general rules on intangible property and fiduciary security exist, but they do not provide a comprehensive framework governing the entire lifecycle of security rights over digital assets. This study aims to examine these regulatory gaps and formulate a model for reforming security law through a comparison of the United States, Singapore, and Australia. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, with qualitative analysis. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s main challenge lies not merely in recognizing the economic value of digital assets, but in integrating rules on asset eligibility, security creation, control, registration, priority, and enforcement. The comparative analysis reveals distinct approaches: in the United States, Uniform Commercial Code Articles 9 and 12 regulate the creation and perfection of security interests and control mechanisms for specified asset categories; Singapore’s jurisprudence recognizes digital assets as property capable of attracting certain proprietary rights; while Australia’s Personal Property Securities Act 2009 provides a framework for security interests in personal property, including registration and priority rules. Based on these findings, this study proposes reforming Indonesia’s Fiduciary Security Law through specific provisions on digital assets, control-based security mechanisms tailored to asset characteristics, an integrated digital collateral registry, clearer creditor priority rules, and transparent, proportionate enforcement that safeguards debtors’ rights. This model contributes an integrated normative framework for digital asset secured transactions to strengthen legal certainty in Indonesia’s asset-based financing system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Law Institute, & Uniform Law Commission. (2022). Uniform Commercial Code amendments (2022): Articles 9 and 12. https://www.uniformlaws.org/acts/catalog/current/ucc

Aswadi, K., & Mudiparwanto, W. A. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Aset Kripto Sebagai Objek Jaminan Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Jaminan. Diversi: Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 424-456. https://doi.org/10.32503/diversi.v10i2.6841

Australia. (2009). Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth). Federal Register of Legislation. https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2009A00130/latest/text

ByBit Fintech Ltd v. Ho Kai Xin [2023] SGHC 199. https://www.elitigation.sg/gd/gd/2023_SGHC_199/pdf

Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.

Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan.

Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

International Institute for the Unification of Private Law. (2023). UNIDROIT principles on digital assets and private law. https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/digital-assets-and-private-law/overview/

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2019). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.

Mulyani, S., Mariyam, S., & Le, H. H. T. (2023). Legal Construction of Crypto Assets as Objects of Fiduciary Collateral. Law Reform, 19(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i1.52697

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2024). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 27 Tahun 2024 tentang Penyelenggaraan Perdagangan Aset Keuangan Digital Termasuk Aset Kripto.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 23 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 27 Tahun 2024 tentang Penyelenggaraan Perdagangan Aset Keuangan Digital Termasuk Aset Kripto.

Palesang, N. J., & Shara, M. C. P. (2025). Legalitas aset kripto sebagai objek jaminan dalam perjanjian kredit di bank. Kertha Negara: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 12(11), 1273–1285. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthanegara/article/view/120168

Pambayun, C. F. D., Tan, D., & Fitri, W. (2025). Hipotek kapal: Perlindungan hukum dan kepastian bagi kreditur. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(3), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v9i3.11137

Putri, L. A., & Tarina, D. D. Y. (2024). Kepastian hukum jaminan fidusia atas cryptocurrency sebagai aset digital tidak berwujud dalam perjanjian kredit di Indonesia. Media Hukum Indonesia, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14208715

Santoso, D. A., Fahamsyah, E., & Adonara, F. F. (2022). Penggunaan cryptocurrency sebagai objek jaminan fidusia. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(9), 15105–15120. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i9.14200

Simanjuntak, I. N. C. Y., & Urbanisasi. (2025). Kedudukan crypto assets sebagai objek jaminan kebendaan dalam perspektif hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Locus: Penelitian & Pengabdian, 4(6), 2606–2614. https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v4i6.4349

Surisman, S., & Inayah, I. (2020). Hak kekayaan intelektual komunal sebagai upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap produk kerajinan. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v4i2.2967

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2013). UNCITRAL guide on the implementation of a security rights registry. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/securityinterests/legislativeguides/security_rights_registry

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2017). UNCITRAL Model Law on Secured Transactions: Guide to enactment. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/securityinterests/modellaw/secured_transactions

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2020). UNCITRAL practice guide to the Model Law on Secured Transactions. https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/19-10910_e.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27

How to Cite

Andara, D., Antasyah, T., & Restu, U. R. (2026). Aset Digital sebagai Objek Jaminan Kebendaan dalam Sistem Hukum Jaminan: Analisis Kepastian Hukum dan Reformulasi Pengaturan Berbasis Perbandingan Hukum. Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v10i2.14265