Relevansi Nilai – Nilai Nasionalisme dan Potret Masyarakat di Daerah Perbatasan Republik Indonesia – Republik Demokratik Timor Leste (Studi Kasus Desa Napan, Kecamatan Bikomi Utara, Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur)

Yanuarius Sani Feka* -  Universitas Timor, Indonesia
Helidorus F. Anin -  Universitas Timor, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/jpk.v8.n1.2023.pp32-41

Indonesian nationalism in border areas often has social issues or conflicts. Strengthening human resources, development or pluralistic primordial character is important in implementing the values of nationalism so that it is relevant to what the Indonesian nation aspires to be. Weak people's behavior towards the value of nationalism will make people become apathetic due to the fading nature of nationalism due to the ineffectiveness of instilling the values of nationalism in the community. The study of the relevance of border communities to the values of nationalism is needed as a character building for the face of the border which relates to human attitudes and behavior, as well as the living conditions of the research area as a border area as well as the benefits of seeing people's behavior in interpreting life in building the nation and loyalty to the state. The nation's journey is often faced with various phenomena of the emergence of other ideologies, so the role of society and the government is to preserve the value of nationalism as something that is absolute for realizing the ideals of the state. The development of the value of nationalism depends on how the citizens' national way of thinking is applied, because it will not work without the spirit of nationalism from the people themselves. The value of nationalism has the goal of teaching a sense of love for the nation and state as well as public awareness in maintaining and perpetuating the identity, integrity, prosperity and strength of the nation. This study uses a qualitative approach with the techniques used to collect data in this research observation, interview and documentation techniques. The results of the research describe that the border community sees nationalism as a matter of development in physical form. The relevance that has been ingrained in the culture of the border community is the value of respecting differences and mutual cooperation. strengthening human resources, development or pluralistic primordial character. It is important to implement the values of nationalism so that it is relevant to what the Indonesian nation aspires to be. Border areas provide a view as a means of upholding the territorial sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia against all forms of threats both from outside and from within the country.
Keywords
Relevansi Nilai 1 Nasionalisme 2 Masyarakat Perbatasan 3
  1. Amalia, F. R. , & N. F. U. (2022). Peran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Dalam Mengatasi Lunturnya Nilai Nasionalisme dan Cinta NKRI di Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan (UPY), 6(1).
  2. Chalid, S. (2019). Model Development Planning Policy Tourism District of Tanah Laut. Diss. Untag 1945.
  3. Departement Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1990). Seminar Sejarah Nasional V: Sub Tema Pengajaran Sejarah. Direktorat Sejarah dan Nilai-Nilai Tradisional.
  4. Dr. Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, S. H. , LL. M. (2019). Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Dalam Lakeisha. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/PENGANTAR_HUKUM_INTERNASIONAL.html?id=AvIUEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
  5. Dwi Rahyanti Sihotang, N. F. (2021). Peningkatan Pembangunan Sosial Melalui Optimalisasi Program Kampung Tematik Kampung Purun , Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Pembangunan Manusia, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jpm.v2i1.1017
  6. Gunawan, I. (Imam), & Sulistyoningrum, R. T. (Rina). (2013). Menggali Nilai-nilai Keunggulan Lokal Kesenian Reog Ponorogo Guna Mengembangkan Materi Keragaman Suku Bangsa Dan Budaya Pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Premiere Educandum, 3(01), 161598. https://doi.org/10.25273/PE.V3I01.59
  7. Hartoyo, A. (2012). Eksplorasi Etnomatematika Pada Budaya Masyarakat Dayak Perbatasan Indonesia Malaysia Kabupaten Sanggau Kalbar. 3082, 13(1), 14–23. http://jurnal.upi.edu/3082/view/1387/eksplorasi-etnomatematika-pada-budaya-masyarakat-dayak-perbatasan-indonesia-malaysia-kabupaten-sanggau-kalbar-.html
  8. Marwasta, D. (2016). Pendampingan Pengelolaan Wilayah Perbatasan Di Indonesia: Lesson Learned Dari Kkn-Ppm Ugm Di Kawasan Perbatasan.
  9. Nurhayati, I., & Agustina, L. (2020). Masyarakat Multikultural: Konsepsi, Ciri dan Faktor Pembentuknya. Akademika, 14(01). https://doi.org/10.30736/adk.v14i01.184
  10. Pamungkas, C. (2016). Nasionalisme Masyarakat Di Perbatasan Laut: Studi Kasus Masyarakat Melayu-Karimun. Masyarakat Indonesia, 41(2), 147–162. http://jmi.ipsk.lipi.go.id/index.php/jmiipsk/article/view/253
  11. Prastyowati;, E. K. S. (2017). Upaya masyarakat perbatasan antarnegara dalam mempertahankan kesejahteraan sosial. //digilib.unri.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=85061&keywords=
  12. Rusmulyani, K. (2020). Semangat Nasionalisme dalam Bingkai Kehidupan Bermasyarakat, Berbangsa dan Bernegara. Nizamia Learning Center.
  13. Sartini, N. W. (2017). Makna simbolik bahasa ritual pertanian masyarakat Bali. Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 7(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2017.V07.I02.P06
  14. Septianingrum, A. D., & Dewi, D. A. (2021). Implementasi Nilai Pancasila Pada Generasi Milenial Di Era Serba Modern. Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.52647/JEP.V3I1.31
  15. Siburian, R. (2012). PULAU SEBATIK: KAWASAN PERBATASAN INDONESIA BERAROMA MALAYSIA. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 14(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.14203/JMB.V14I1.87
  16. Smith, A. D. (2003). Nasionalisme teori,ideologi, sejarah. Erlangga.
  17. Subagyo, A. (t.t.). Bela Negara. Graha Ilmu.
  18. Subagyo, A. (2014). Bela Negara. Graha Ilmu.
  19. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfa Beta.
  20. Suharto, E. (2015). Peran Perlindungan Sosial Dalam Mengatasi Kemiskinan Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Program Keluarga Harapan. Sosiohumaniora, 17(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.24198/SOSIOHUMANIORA.V17I1.5668
  21. Sunarso. (2008). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan PKN . Yudhistira.
  22. Suratman, E. (Eddy). (2004). Dampak Kebijakan Pengembangan Kawasan Perbatasan Terhadap Kinerja Perekonomian Kalimantan Barat: Analisis Simulasi Dengan Pendekatan Sistem Neraca Sosial Ekonomi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 5(1), 35–60. https://www.neliti.com/publications/84407/
  23. Taena, W. (2009). Kajian Pengembangan Ekonomi Wilayah Perbatasan Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara dengan District Enclave Oekusi. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/5906
  24. Ulber Silalahi. (2009). Metode Penelitian Sosial (Aep Gunarsa, Ed.). Refika Aditama. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=694081
  25. Wartulas, S. (2022). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Sebagai Dasar Nilai Dan Pedoman Berkarya Bagi Lulusan Perguruan Tinggi. DIALEKTIKA Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar, 12(1), 865–865. https://journal.peradaban.ac.id/index.php/jdpgsd/article/view/989
  26. Yatim, B. (2001). Soekarno, Islam dan Nasionalisme. Nuansa.
  27. Zainudin Djafar. (2008). Indonesia,ASEAN & Dinamika Asia Timur. PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya,Jl Kramat Raya No.5.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2023-01-04
Published: 2023-02-17
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: