PENERAPAN STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN FASE BELAJAR MODEL VAN HIELE PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24269/js.v2i2.626Abstract
ABSTRACT. Flat space is part of the geometry that has an important role in applied mathematics and a lot in life, so understanding geometry concepts need to be taught to students early on. Reality on the ground shows that the students' understanding of the concept of geometry is still low. One of the students' a difficulty in understanding the geometry is influenced by the presentation of the material is less an impression of the teacher to the students. Students are not given the opportunity to discover the concept of geometry independently based on the characteristics of the stages of thinking. To overcome the difficulties of the students in learning geometry, how that can be achieved is by the application of the van Hiele theory.
Key Words: flat space, Van Hiele theory learning phase
ABSTRAK. Bangun ruang sisi datar merupakan bagian dari geometri yang mempunyai peranan penting dalam matematika dan banyak diterapkan dalam kehidupan, sehingga pemahaman konsep bangun ruang perlu diajarkan pada siswa sejak dini. Kenyataan di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman siswa terhadap konsep bangun ruang masih rendah. Salah satu faktor kesulitan siswa dalam memahami bangun ruang dipengaruhi oleh penyajian materi dari guru kurang membekas bagi siswa. Siswa tidak diberi kesempatan untuk menemukan konsep bangun ruang secara mandiri berdasarkan karakteristik tahap berpikirnya. Untuk mengatasi kesulitan-kesulitan siswa dalam belajar geometri tersebut, cara yang dapat ditempuh adalah dengan penerapan teori van Hiele.
Kata Kunci: bangun ruang sisi datar, fase belajar model Van Hiele
References
DAFTAR RUJUKAN
Clements, D. H.,& Battista, M. T (1992). Geometry and Spatial Reasoning. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching And Learning.
Crowley, M. L (1987): The Van Hiele Model of the development of geometric thought, in NCTM (1987): Learning ang Teaching Geomatry, K-12. (NCTM: Reston, USA), pp.1-16.
Depdiknas, 2006. Standar Isi. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
De Villiers, M. (2004). Using dynamic geometry to expand mathematics teachers understanding of proof. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, pp. 703-724.
Erdogan, T., Akkaya, R.,& Celebi Akkaya, S. (2009). The Effect of the Van Hiele Model Based Instruction on the Creative Thinking Levels of 6th Grade Primary School Students. Educational Sciences:Theory & Practice, 181-194.
Halat, E. (2008). In-Service Middle and High School Mathematics teachers:Geometric Reasoning Stages and Gender. The Mathematics Educator, pp.8-14.
Halat, E. (2006). Sex-related Differences In The Acquisition Of The Van Hiele Levels and Motivation in Learning Geometry. Asia Pasific Education Review, pp. 173-183.
Hirschfeld,Kimberly. 2008. Mathematical Communication, Conceptual Understanding and Students ‘Attitude Toward Mathematics. Department of Mathematics. University of Nebraska.
Kumar,K.,Kumar,V.2010. comparison of NCERT and PSEB Geometry text Books on the Basis of Van Hiele’s level of thinking in geometry. (online). Jurnal Learning Community:Vol 1. No 2 Dec.2010 (page 253-257):India.
Mason, M. 2010. The Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Understanding (online) Professional Handbook for Teacher, Geometry: Explorations and Applications, McDougal Litteli Inc.
Unal, H., Jakubowski, E.,&Corey, D. (2009, December 15). Differences in learning geometry among high and low spatial ability pre-service mathematics teachers International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, pp.997-1012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
