The Violation of Bureaucracy at Local Election in Gowa South Sulawesi: Based on Weberian and Marxism Concept

Wiwid Ambarwati* -  The Election Supervisory Board of South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Gustiana Anwar Kambo -  Hasanuddin University, Indonesia
Muhammad Muhammad -  Hasanuddin University, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v8i2.2474

State civil apparatus has mobilized by a pair of the candidate, Ichsan Yasin Limpo and Andi Mudzakkar (IYL-Cakka) on the 2018 South Sulawesi Local Election in Gowa was very structured and massive. That case is proved by the victory of Them in Gowa around 68.38 percent. The support from Gowa's society for the nominating process is 260 650 IYL-Cakka identity. Based on the result of administrative verification showed that 0.5 percent are civil state apparatus's identity and the result of factual verification is 1.53 percent. Meanwhile, the state civil Also apparatus supported them with symbols of the candidate. It’s proved by a report of 37 cases of neutrality violation to the South Sulawesi Provincial of the General Election Supervisory. This research method used a descriptive case study approach. The Data on this research used primary and secondary data. The data were collected from several methods: observation, interviews, and documentary. The result of this study indicated resources that supported instruction to them have consisted of two categories: 1) the instruction to the collected identity cards and 2) the instruction to used symbols. The identity cards were collected by three elements: the winning team for IYL-Cakka, the Headman and their staffs, and the other elements (agricultural extension workers and educators). The instruction to used symbols created has been done with the group in social media for all of the government head offices and created the formal regular meetings outside the Gowa (like as benchmarking).
Keywords
Mobilization; State Civil Apparatus; Local Election;
  1. Akbar, M. (2016). Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Dalam Memilih Calon Bupati Gowa pada Pilkada 2015 Kabupaten Gowa. Theses. Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar.
  2. Alwi, S. (1991). Penerapan Model Bureaucratic Authoritarian Dalam Politik Indonesia dan Implikasinya Terhadap Partisipasi Kelompok Massa. UNISIA, 11(IV), 38.
  3. Azhari. (2011). Politik dan Birokrasi di Negara Bagian Sabah Malaysia (Studi Kasus Intervensi Pejabat Birokrasi). Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan No. 4 Oktober Desember 2011.
  4. Bachrach, P., & Botwinick, A. (1992.). Power and Empowerment, A Radical Theory of Participaticipatory Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University.
  5. Beetham, D. (1987). Bureaucracy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  6. Creswell, J. C. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset, Memilih Diantara Lima Pendekatan Edisi Indonesia Cetakan I. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.
  7. Daniasyah, D. (2015). Bureaucratic Political and Neutrality of Bureaucracy in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Komunikasi Volume V No 2 / Desember 2015.
  8. Dowding, K. (1995). The Civil Service. New-York: Routledge Publisher.
  9. Easton, D. (1965). Framework forPolitical Analysis. New York: Cliffs-Prentice.
  10. Firnas, M. A. (2016). Politik dan Birokrasi : Masalah Netralitas Birokrasi di era Reformasi. Jurnal Review Politik Volume 6 No 1 Juni 2016.
  11. Heckcsher, C., & Donellon, A. (1994). The Post Bureaucratic Organization, New Perspective On Organizational Change. CA: Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks.
  12. Hindess, B. (1996). Discourse of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
  13. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Division of Research Harvard Business School.
  14. Mas’oed, M. (2008). Politik, Birokrasi dan Pembangunan. Yoyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  15. Mufti, M. (2012). Teori-Teori Politik. Jakarta: CV Redaksi Pustaka Setia.
  16. Mustaman, M. (2015). Peranan Partai Politik dalam Memobilisasi Pemilih Pada Pemilu Legislatif Tahun 2014 di Kota Manado (Suatu Studi Di Dewan Pimpinan Cabang Partai Demokrasi Indonesia Perjuangan). Jurnal Politico, 4 (1).
  17. Prianto, Andi Luhur. (2017). Open Governance, Close Government Participation and Transparency in Local Governance, Gowa Regency. Paper was presented in Asia Pacific Society of Public Affairs (APSPA) 2016 Annual Conference, August 10-11, 2016, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  18. Sharp, G. (1973). The Politics of Nonviolent Action Part One: Power and Struggle. Boston: Extending Horizon Books Porter Sargent Publication.
  19. Sudaryono. (2018). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  20. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan RnD. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  21. Thoha, M. (2014). Birokrasi dan Politik di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Pustaka.
  22. Thoha, M. (2014). Birokrasi Politik dan Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  23. Yin, R. K. (2015). Studi Kasus (Desain dan Metode) Cetakan ke 14. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.
  24. Badan Pengawas Pemilu Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. (2018). Hasil Putusan dan Berita Acara Pemeriksaan ASN di Bawaslu Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Badan Pengawas Pemilu Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan, Makassar.
  25. fajar.co.id. (2018, Maret 18). Pelanggaran Netralitas ASN, Sultra Terbanyak, Sulsel Kedua. Retrieved Mei 2018, 8, from Fajar.co.id: https://fajar.co.id/2018/03/18/pelanggaran-netralitas-asn-sultra-terbanyak-sulsel-kedua/
  26. inikata.com. (2017, Agustus 13). Sentilan Keras Kubu NH Soal ASN Gowa Kampanyekan Punggawa. Retrieved Mei 8, 2018, from Inikata.com: https://inikata.com/2017/08/13/sentilan-keras-kubu-nh-soal-asn-gowa-kampanyekan-kitapunggawa/

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2020-02-27
Published: 2020-06-01
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: 246 123
Citation :