Relasi Gender dalam Kolom Humor “Si Palui” di Banjarmasin Post (Analisis Wacana Kritis Norman Fairclough pada Kolom Humor Si Palui di Banjarmasin Post)

Irene Santika Vidiadari* -  Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ars.v5i2.488

As well as a result of cultural perception, humour can also be seen as a kind of text representing the culture of society which produces it. The humour column of “Si Palui” in Banjarmasin Post is not an exception. Reflecting the culture of the people of Banjar, the stories in Si Palui are strongly related to women and how men, as the dominant gender in Banjar culture, deal with women in daily life. Inasmuchas text is firmly connected with discourse, using Norman Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis, in this paper I will see the discourse of gender relation in Si Palui on three levels—micro (text), mezzo (text producent), and macro (sociocultural). On micro level the representation is seen from the using of language. On the second level, mezzo, how women are represented is studied from the view point of the text producent, namely Banjarmasin Post. Meanwhile on the third level which is macro, the representation of women in Si Palui is comprehended from broader perspective, namely the Banjar culture which can not be separated from Islam Banjar. It is concluded from this research that: (1) On micro level men are always more dominant than women, (2) on mezzo level the sexist humor of Si Palui is strongly related to the fact that all of the writer of Si Palui are men, and (3) on macro level, the gender relation narrated on Si Palui is firmly connected with patriarchal ideology adopted by the people of Banjar, which is legitimated by Islam Banjar.
Keywords
Humour, Gender Relation, CDA Norman Fairclough
  1. Althusser, Louis. (2008). Tentang Ideologi: Marxisme Strukturalis, Psikoanalisis,Cultural Studies.(Olsy Vinoli Arnof, Terjemahan).Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  2. Anwar, Ahya. (2009). Geneologi Feminis: Dinamika Pemikiran Feminis dalam Novel Pengarang Perempuan Indonesia 1933-2005. Jakarta: Republika.
  3. Barjie B, Ahmad. (2011). Refleksi Banua Banjar: Kumpulan Tulisan SeputarKesultanan Banjar, Sejarah Agama dan Sosial Budaya. Martapura:PustakaAgung Kesultanan Banjar.
  4. Beechey, Veronica. (1979). On Patriachy.Feminist Review. Vol (3) hlm. 66-82.
  5. Danandjaja,J. (1989). Humor. Dalam Ensklopedia Nasional Indonesia Jilid VI. Jakarta: Cipta Adi Pustaka.
  6. Eriyanto.(2011).Analisis Wacana, Pengantar Analisis Teks Media.Yogyakarta: LKiS.
  7. Fairclough, Norman. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
  8. -------------------------.(1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis Within Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society. No. 3, hlm 193-219.
  9. -------------------------. (1993). “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketizationof Public Discourse: The Universities”. Discourse and Society. No. 4 (2), hlm 133-168.
  10. -------------------------. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
  11. Fakih, Mansour .(1996).Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  12. Fauzan, U. (2014). Analisis Wacana Kritis dari Model Fairclough Hingga Mills. Jurnal Pendidik Vol. 6 (1) hlm. 123-137.
  13. Hall, S. (1988). The Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism among the theorists. dalam C. Nelson dan L.Grossberg (ed)Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. London: Macmillan.
  14. ---------. (1997). Representation. London: Sage Publication.
  15. Hendarto, P. (1990). Filsafat Humor. Jakarta: Karya Megah.
  16. Ideham et al. (2003). Sejarah Banjar. Kalimantan Selatan: Balitbangda.
  17. Jackson, Stevi dan Jackie Jones. 2009. Pengantar Teori-Teori Feminis Kontemporer. (Tim Penerjemah Jalasutra, Terjemahan).Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  18. Japai Bumbunannya (2016, Januari 10). Banjarmasin Post hlm. 14 diakses melalui https://issuu.com/deny_bpost/docs/bp20160110
  19. Juhaidi, Ahmad. (2008). Nilai-Nilai Humor Urang Banjar dalam Kisah HidupSumambing. Al-Banjari: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 8 (2) diakses dari http://idr.iain-antasari.ac.id/335/ pada tanggal 2 Agustus 2016
  20. Kahilangan Hayam (2016, Maret 28). Banjarmasin Post hlm. 14 diakses melalui https://issuu.com/deny_bpost/docs/bp20160328
  21. Lan, Mey, Susetiawan dan A. N. Abrar. (2001). “Budaya Patriarki dalam Pers Indonesia Masa Orde Baru”. Sosiohumanika. No 14 (2), hlm 353-368.
  22. Larson, Charles U. (2010). Persuasion:Reception and Responsibility (12th ed). Boston: Wadsworth.
  23. Maslakhah, Siti dan I Dewa Putu Wijana. (2004). Bahasa Jawa dalam Ketoprak Humor RCTI (Suatu Tinjauan Sosiolinguistik). Humanika no. 17 (4) hlm 577-596.
  24. Omara, Andy. (2004). “Perempuan, Budaya Patriarki, dan Representasi”. Mimbar Hukum, No.2, hlm 148-165.
  25. Paling Manunjul (2016, Februari 10). Banjarmasin Post hlm. 14 diakses melalui https://issuu.com/deny_bpost/docs/bp20160210
  26. Papana, Ramon. (2012). Kiat Tahap Awal Belajar Stand Up Comedy. Jakarta: Media Kita.
  27. Pormes, F.S. (2015). Analisis Humor Epen Kah Cupen To. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  28. Rahmanadji, Didiek. (2007). Sejarah, Teori, Jenis dan Fungsi Humor. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni, no.2 (35), hlm 213-221.
  29. Rizkie, I.H. (2013). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama dan Implikatur Wacana Humor dalam Rubrik “Mesem” Surat Kabar Harian Warta Jateng. Skripsi. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
  30. Saleh, Idwar et al. 1991. Adat Istiadat dan Adat Perkawinan Daerah Kalimantan Selatan. Banjarmasin: Direktorat Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional.
  31. Setyobudi, Imam dan Mukhlas Alkaf. (2011). Antropologi Feminisme dan Polemik Seputar Tubuh Penari Perempuan Jaipongan Menurut Perspektif Foucault. Humaniora. No. 1 vol. 23, hlm 37-48.
  32. Satungging-Tungging (2016, Maret 9). Banjarmasin Post hlm. 14 diakses melalui https://issuu.com/deny_bpost/docs/bp20160309
  33. Storey, John. (2007). Cultural Studies dan Kajian Budaya Pop. Yogyakarta:Jalasutra.
  34. Storey, John. (2015). An Introductory Guide To Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. New York: Routledge.
  35. Thornham, Sue. (2010). Teori Feminis dan Cultural Studies. (Asma Bey Mahyuddin, Terjemahan).Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
  36. Tim Penulis Banjarmasin Post. (2011). 40 Tahun Banjarmasin Post. Banjarmasin: PT Grafika Wangi Kalimantan.
  37. Vidiadari, Irene Santika. (2013). Resepsi Pembaca Perempuan Banjar Muslim Terhadap Kolom Si Palui dengan Tema Perceraian dan Poligami di Surat Kabar Harian Banjarmasin Post dengan Pendekatan Encoding-Decoding Stuart Hall. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
  38. Wijana, I Dewa Putu. (1994). “Pemanfaatan Homonimi dalam Humor”. Humaniora No 1, hlm. 21-28
  39. Wijana, I dewa Putu. (1995). Wacana Kartun dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Disertasi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  40. Wiyatmi. (2008).Representasi Peran Dan Relasi Gender Dalam Novel Cantik Itu Luka Karya Eka Kurniawan Dan Nayla Karya Djenar Maesa Ayu, Laporan Penelitian, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
  41. Wood. J.T. (2008). Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender and Culture (8th ed). Boston: Wadsworth.
  42. Zainuddin, Muhammad. (2010).Nilai Budaya dalam Sarawin Cerita Rakyat Banjar: Analisis Sosiologi Sastra. Tesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  43. Zulkifli. (2009). Nilai Budaya Banjar dalam Cerita Si Palui. Disertasi. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2017-05-26
Published: 2017-06-01
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: