Judicial Corruption Between Community Legal Culture And Government Administrative Legal Violence

Eman Suparman* -  Universitas Padjajaran Bandung, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v1i2.767

This Research focus in Judicial Corruption between community. This research as kualitative descriptive, Based on the description discussed in introduction and discussion section, there are some conclusion that can be drawn as follows: According to the examples given, it is true that judicial corruption that involves government officers occurs in the judiciary institutions. Based on the result of observation, it is found that judicial corruption does not only performed by government officers, but it also involves other parties, in this case; advocates and defendants. Essentially, judicial corruption behavior is also influenced by people’s misconception of legal culture. As the justiciabelen or the seeker of justice, what is perceived by people is to win the civil case, or not to be imprisoned for criminal case. Therefore, this kind of legal culture always uses economic approach. It is true that one of factors that influence the judicial corruption is the violation of government administration law. In this case, such violation is performed by the government officers that are assisted by the advocates altogether.

  1. Anthon Freddy Susanto, 2014, “Mitos Peradilan Bersih” (Ketika Etika Mulai Tergerus dan Menjadi Barang Langka); dalam Problematika Hukum dan Peradilan di Indonesia, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: PALINFO KY.
  2. Fajar Sugianto, 2013, Economic Analysis Of Law, Jakarta, Kencana.
  3. ------------------, 2013, Economic Analysis Of Law Seri II, Jakarta, Kencana.
  4. Frans Hendra Winarta, 2014, Membangun Profesionalisme Aparat Penegak Hukum; dalam Problematika Hukum dan Peradilan di Indonesia, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: PALINFO KY.
  5. Koentjaraningrat, 2005, Pengantar Antropologi Pokok-Pokok Etnografi II, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta.
  6. Lawrence M. Friedman, 2013, Sistem Hukum Perspektif Ilmu Sosial, Bandung, Nusa Media.
  7. Musakkir, 2013, Putusan Hakim Yang Diskriminatif Dalam Perkara Pidana, Jogjakarta: Rangkang Education.
  8. ------------, 2014, Problem Penegakan Hukum oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum di Indonesia; dalam Problematika Hukum dan Peradilan di Indonesia, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: PALINFO KY.
  9. Sugeng Pujileksono, 2015, Pengantar Antropologi Memahami Realitas Sosial Budaya, Malang, Intrans Publishing.
  10. Suteki, 2013, Desain Hukum Di Ruang Sosial, Semarang, Thafa Media.
  11. Teddy Asmara, 2011, Budaya Ekonomi Hukum Hakim, Semarang: Fasindo.
  12. T. Gayus Lumbuun, 2014, Pembaruan Struktur, Substansi, dan Kultur Hukum di Indonesia; dalam Problematika Hukum dan Peradilan di Indonesia, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: PALINFO KY.
  13. Zainal Arifin Mochtar, 2014, Sistem Peradilan yang Transparan dan Akuntabel (Catatan Kecil Penguatan); dalam Problematika Hukum dan Peradilan di Indonesia, Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: PALINFO KY.
  14. The 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia.
  15. The Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 Year 2014 concerning The Goverment Administration.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2017-12-13
Published: 2017-12-13
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: