PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DISABILITAS YANG MELAKUKAN PENGANIAYAAN

Authors

  • Ridho Ardika Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i2.9101

Abstract

The Criminal Code has explained the responsible ability of a person with a disability in article 44 paragraphs 1 and 2, while in Law No. 1 of 2023, Discuss more specifically about disability criminal liability, according to court decision No. 57 / Pid.B / 2021 / PN. Kba involving a person with a mental disability who molested his own sibling. The purpose of this study is to determine the accountability of criminal acts of maltreatment committed by disabilities in the perspective of Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law and use Law No. 1 of 2023 as a comparison with the Criminal Code. The research method used in this study is the normative juridical method using a legal approach, a conceptual approach and a comparative approach. Criminal responsibility for perpetrators of abuse committed by disabilities in the Islamic Criminal Law a person is considered responsible if he has the ability to think and choose (idrak and ikhtiar). Meanwhile, in the Criminal Law, a person with a disability cannot be held accountable for his mental disability, then in Law No. 1 of 2023, an intellectual or mental disability cannot be convicted if he has reached moderate to severe levels. In court decision No.57/Pid.B/2021/PN. The accused should not be punished because his soul was disturbed during his growth or because he was in a mental hospital if his actions could not be held accountable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Hariss, N. F. (2021). Kecakapan Bertindak Penyandang Disabilitas Autisme Menurut Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Ilmiah Unversitas Batanghari Jambi, 943-948. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v21i3.1675
Afridus Darto, A. S. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Pengidap Gangguan Kejiwaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra, 261. https://doi.org/10.38156/jihwp.v1i2.128
Baroroh, N. N. (2019). Status Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Bagi Penderita Gangguan Mental Kategori Kepribadian Antisosial Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Jurnal Al-Mazhib, 175. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v7i2.1882
Dian Candra Dewi, S. (2014). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penyandang Disabilitas Mental Sebagai Pelaku Pencabulan. Recidive Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 186. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i3.11837
E.Y. Kanter, S. S. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta : Alumni.
Elbasan, B. D. (2013). Is There any Difference in Health Related Quality of Life, Self Care and Social Function in Children with Different Disabilities Living in Turkey? Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, 281-288.
Faiz Aqiel Maula Hidayat, A. L. (2023). Disharmoni Pertanggungajawaba Pidana Disabilitas Mental dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. JUSTISI, 330. https://doi.org/10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v9i3.2474
Ferryal Basbeth, E. K. (2008). Tindak Pidana Pada Retardasi Mental. Indonesian jounal of Legal And Forensik Science, 14.
Hardi Done, T. J. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Penyandang Retardasi Mental dalam Kasus Pencabulan Anak dalam Studi Komparatif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kanturuna Wolio, 137. https://doi.org/10.55340/kanturunawolio.v4i2.1327
Hasan, M. S. (2013). Hukum Pidana Islam (Fiqh Jinayah). Bandung : Pustaka Setia.
Hidayat, F. A. (2023). Disharmoni Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Disabilitas Mental dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Justisi, 330. https://doi.org/10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v9i3.2474
Irfani, N. (2020). Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia,, 313. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i3.711
Kadek Januarsyah Adi Sudharma, A. M. (2021). Pemidanaan Terhadap Penyandan Disabilitas Mental Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan ( Studi Putusan Perkara Nomor 16/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn.Wsb ) . Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, 65. https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v3i2.2957
Lewokeda, K. M. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tindak Pidana Terkait Pemberian Delegasi Kewenangan. Mimbar keadilan, 189. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.1779
Mayasari, D. E. (2018). Perlindungan Hak Anak Kategori Juvenile Deliquency. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 385-400. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i3.11837
Muslich, A. W. (2006). Pengantar dan Asas Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
O.S, H. d. (2013). Hukum Pidana Islam (FIqh Jinayah). Bandung : Pustaka Setia.
Orinta Vavinta Ida, N. S. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dengan Gnagguan Jiwa Menurut Hukum Positif. Binamulia Hukum, 269. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i2.620
Rahmat Rahmat et al. (2021). Sanksi Bagi Pelaku Pembunuhan yan Menderita Gangguan Bipolar Pespektif Hukum Islam. Bustanul Fuqaha, Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam, 194-208. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v2i2.360
Santoso, T. (2016). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Sayuti, J. A. (n.d.). Al Jami’ Ash Shagir. Beirut: Dal al fiqr.
Sudharma, K. J. (2021). Pemidanaan Terhadap Penyandang Disabilitas Mental Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Studi Putusan Nomor 16/Pid.Sus/20019/Pn.Wsb). Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS), 65. https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v3i2.2957
Tasse, M. J. (2016). The Relation Between Intellectual Functioning and Adaptive Behavior in the Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability. Silver Spring: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Yati Nurhayati, I. M. (2021). Metodologi Normatif dan Empiris dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 4. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14

Downloads

Published

2024-05-10

How to Cite

Ardika, R. (2024). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DISABILITAS YANG MELAKUKAN PENGANIAYAAN. Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i2.9101

Issue

Section

Articles