Legal Truth (Menakar Kebenaran Hukum)

Yogi Prasetyo* -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v1i1.588

Law as part of human knowledge have various views on the truth. The legal truth is more likely to be assessed according to the perception and point of view of each one, the truth of the law will be assessed in accordance with the standards of the existing measures on him. Not infrequently respective claims to truth are obtained, causing antagonism and conflict. For that we would need to measure the truth of the law into a theorization. Legal correspondence theory of truth to understand the truth as empirical reality sensory contained in the community, to get this truth by the method of inductive reasoning, which draw conclusions from the events that are specific to the incidence of common law. The coherence theory of truth to understand the law as a result of conceptual ideas of rational logic of human reason, to obtain this truth by the method of deductive reasoning, which draw conclusions from the events that are common to a special legal events. While the pragmatic theory of truth law basing the truth if it can provide benefits for humans.

Keywords
truth, law, correspondence, coherence, pragmatic
  1. Aharon Barak, 2006, The Judge in a Democracy, Princeton University Press
  2. Bernard Arief Sidharta, 1999, Refleksi tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum, Sebuah penelitian tentang fundasi kefilsafatan dan sifat kilmuan Ilmu Hukum sebagai landasan pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia, Bandung, Mandar Maju
  3. Davidson. D, 1986, A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge, Truth And Interpretation,Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Ernest LePore, Oxford, Basil Blackwell
  4. Ending Solehudin, 2012, Filsafat Ilmu Menurut al-Qur’an, jurnal Islamica, Vol.6, No.2, Maret
  5. Jujun S. Suriasumantri, 2007, Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer, Jakarta, Pustaka Sinar Harapan
  6. H. P. Visser ‘t Hooft, 2003, Filsafat Ilmu Hukum. Terjemah oleh Bernard Arief Sidharta, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Parahiyangan Bandung
  7. H. Salim, 2010, Perkembangan Teori Dalam Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers
  8. Khudzaifah Dimyati, 2014, Pemikiran Hukum; Kontruksi Epistemologis Berbasis Budaya Hukum Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Genta Publishing
  9. M.D.A. Freeman, Llyods’s, 2001, Introduction to Jurisprudence, London, Sweet & Maxwell
  10. Mulyadi Kartanegara, 2002, Menembus Batas Waktu; Panorama Filsafat Islam, Bandung, Mizan
  11. Paul Scholten, 2003, Struktur Ilmu Hukum. Terjemah oleh Arief Sidharta, Bandung, Alumni
  12. Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2007, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group
  13. Pierre Simon Laplace, 1951, A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, Terjemah oleh Frederick Wilson Truscott dan Frederick Lincoln Emory, New York: Dover Publications
  14. R.A. Posner, 2001, Frontiers of Legal Theory, Harvard University Press
  15. Satjipto Rahardjo, 2002, Sosiologi Hukum; Perkembangan, Metode dan Pilihan Masalah, Muhammadiyah University Press Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  16. .............2006, Hukum dalam Jagat Ketertiban, Jakarta, Penerbit UKI Press
  17. Sudarsono, 1997, Filsafat Islam, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta
  18. William James, 1907, Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, New York, Longman Green
  19. Sunaryati Hartono, 1994, Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia Pada Akhir Abad Ke-20, Bandung, Alumni
  20. Jurnal:
  21. Abdul Basith Junaidy, 2014, Memahami Maslahat Menggunakan Pendekatan Filsafat Utilitarianisme Menurut Muhammad Abû Zahrah, Jurnal Islamica Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Vol.8, No.2, Maret
  22. Absori, 2015, Pengembangan Epistimologi Ilmu Hukum, Seminar Nasional, 11 April 2015 di Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  23. Anis Ibrahim, 2004, Landasan Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum (Menuju Satu Kesepakatan Ontologis dan Epistemologis), Jurnal Hukum Argumentum, Vol.4, No.1, Desember
  24. Bernard L. Tanya, 2000, Beban Budaya Lokal Menghadapi Hukum Negara: Analisis Budaya atas Kesulitan Sosio-Kultural Orang Sabu Menghadapi Regulasi Negara, Disertasi Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
  25. Fathul Mufid, 2013, Perkembangan Paradigma Epistemologi Dalam Filsafat Islam, Jurnal Ulumuna Studi Keislaman, Vol.17, No.1, Juni
  26. Hardiansyah, 2013, Teori Pengetahuan Edmund Husserl, Jurnal Substantia Vol. 15, No. 2, Oktober 2013
  27. Kaharuddin, 2012, Sosiologi Hukum: Sebuah Kajian Dalam Memahami Hukum, Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, Volume 7, Nomor 1, Oktober
  28. Kudzaifah Dimyati dan Kelik Wardiono, 2005, Dinamika Pemikiran Hukum: Orientasi dan Karateristik Pemikiran Expertise Hukum Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 8, No. 2, September
  29. M. Rasyid Ridho, 2006, Epistemologi Islamic Studies Kontemporer (Relasi Sirkular Epistemologi Bayani, iIrfani dan Burhani), jurnal Karsa, Vol.X, No.2 Oktober
  30. Mugiyono, 2015, Konstruksi Pemikiran Islam Reformatif, Jurnal Tajdid Vol.XIV, No.2, Juli-Desember
  31. Paulson dan Stanley L. Paulson, 2006, Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy; Gustav Radbruch, Journal of Legal Studies, Oxford University, Vol.26, No.1
  32. Ratna Puspitasari, 2012, Kontribusi Empirisme Terhadap Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, Jurnal Edueksos Vol.I, No.1, Januari-Juni
  33. Tonny Rompis, 2015, Kajian Sosiologi Hukum Tentang Menurunnya Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Hukum Dan Aparat Penegak Hukum Di Sulawesi Utara, Jurnal Lex Crimen Vol.IV, No.8, Oktober
  34. Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2010, Beyond Formalist-Realist Devided the Role of Politics in Judging, Princeton University Press
  35. Widodo Dwi Putro, 2001, Tinjauan Kritis-Filosofis Terhadap Paradigma Positivisme Hukum, Disertasi Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indoensia
  36. Yefrizawati, 2005, Ilmu Hukum: Suatu Kajian Ontologis, E-Journal Repository, Univ. Sumatra Utara
  37. Zulfadli Barus, 2013, Analisis Filosofis Tentang Peta Konseptual Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Penelitian Hukum Sosiologis, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.13, No.2, Mei

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2017-08-02
Published: 2017-08-02
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 604 8058
Citation :