The Weakness Of The Law In The Republic Of Indonesia Number 18 Year 2003 On The Advocate

Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan* -  Universitas Muhammadiyah ponorogo, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v1i1.586

This article intends to analyze the use of the jury system in the criminal justice system of Indonesia, jury is a form of lay participation or the participation of lay that community of professional non-law in the judiciary, to make decisions which provide a more fulfilling sense of justice in society, in order to avoid the role of judges is absolute in the criminal justice process, in the legal system of modern states today dichotomy between legal systems tradition of common law or civil law is fading and towards the tendency to mix both the legal system in order to find substantive justice in the judicial process. Indonesia never make changes conceptually to the criminal justice system, so that the judicial process drab dominated the role of judges is great where law and justice seems to be the monopoly of a judge, the role of judges becomes absolute in determining aspects of the facts (fact finding) and the legal aspect in judge, legal research using law approach, conceptual, and comparative law. The results of this study is that morality is the essence of a sense of justice in society, morality can not be separated from the law, because morality is is what is considered correct by the general public, so the public will view the law as something that has no authority and can not be trusted, when morality is left in any decision of the judge in criminal justice. Entering jury in the justice system is able to raise the level of public confidence in the legal and judicial institutions that exist, because the inclusion of jury in the criminal justice system to prosecute in the aspect of fact (fact finding) addition will ease the task of the judge also made aspects of morality local is the living law in automatically entered in every decision, every decision so it is possible to better meet the sense of justice in society.

Keywords
jury, society, the criminal justice system
  1. Agustin Teras Narang. 2003. Proses Pembahasan Undang-undang Advokat di Parlemen. Cet. 1. Jakarta: Yayasan Pancur Siwah.
  2. Draft Rancangan Undang-undang (RUU) Advokat tahun 2013
  3. Dwi Nurdiansyah Santosa. 2009. “Analisis Yuridis Hak Imunitas dan Malpraktek Advokat serta Implementasinya di Kota Surakarta”, Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
  4. Edi Krisharyanto. 2007. Profesi Advokat Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
  5. Faried Muhammad Yamin. 2012. “Kajian Teoritis Tentang Antinomy Normen(konflik norma) antara Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana Dengan Undang-undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat Terkait Dengan Kewajiban Memegang Kerahasiaan Klien Bagi Advokat”. Skripsi, Surakarta: Digilib Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS)
  6. Hasanudin Nasution. Mewujudkan Organisasi Advokat yang Mandiri dan Profesional,www.pustakalegal.wordpress.com/materi/organisasi-advokat/?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C8549366144 diakses pada 19 Nopember 2015 pukul accessed on November 19, 2015 at 11.00
  7. Irman Putra Siddin, UU Advokat Dinilai Tidak berkualitas, www.beritasatu.com/nasional/314914-uu-advokat-dinilai-tak-berkualitas.html accessed on November 19, 2015 at 23:04
  8. Kode Etik Advokat Indonesia (KEAI), Komite Kerja Advokat Indonesia (KKAI) 2002
  9. Peraturan Peradi Nomor 1 Tahun 2013
  10. Peraturan Peradi Nomor 1 Tahun 2015
  11. Peraturan Peradi Nomor 3 Tahun 2006
  12. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 006/PUU-II/2004
  13. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 014/PUU-IV/2006
  14. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 26/PUU-XI/2013
  15. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XIII/2015
  16. Sulaiman, Alfin, Runtuhnya Cita-cita Kewibawaan dan Kemandirian Profesi Advokat, www.peradi-jaksel.blogspot.com accessed on Wednesday, December, 02 2015
  17. Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung KMA No. 073/KMA/HK.01/XI/2015
  18. Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945
  19. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 18 tahun 2003 tentang Advokat
  20. www.detik.com/news/berita/1801931/wahai-pengacara-seluruh-indonesia-kapan-akur- accessed on Wednesday, December 02, 2015
  21. www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol7581/banyak-mengandung-kelemahan-uu-advokat-diminta-direvisi- accessed on Wednesday, December 02, 2015
  22. www.hukumonline.com/hol/14008/peradin-menggugat-keabsahan-peradi accessed on Wednesday, December 02, 2015
  23. www.peradi-jaksel.blogspot.com/2009/09/konflik-organisasi-advokat-runtuhnya.html accessed on Wednesday, December 02, 2015
  24. Yio Tjeh Kie. 2012. “Malpraktik Advokat dan Sanksi Kode Etiknya”. Skripsi, Depok: Universitas Indonesia.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2017-08-02
Published: 2017-08-02
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: