TANGGUNG JAWAB LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN MAGELANG TERHADAP TAHANAN TITIPAN

Putra Aji Widya P.* -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
M. Endriyo Susila -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Yeni Widowaty -  Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v5i2.4074

This study aims to examine the responsibility of an institution, namely the correctional institution in the city of Magelang in reviewing detainees in custody or those who are temporarily or during the completion of the sentencing process. The method used in this research is sociological normative legal research. The author uses the type of legal research above in a simple way, but the type of normative legal research is more prominently displayed with the aim of better understanding the regulations that apply in the juridical study of the responsibilities of the Correctional Institution towards prisoners entrusted in Magelang. From the results of the study, it was concluded that the juridical responsibility for prisoners entrusted to be in the Correctional Institution is the party or agency that entrusted them according to the level of examination. Physical responsibility for prisoners entrusted to be in the Correctional Institution is the party entrusted by the detaining party, namely the Detention Center but the Correctional Institution can also function as a Detention Center.

Keywords
Responsibility, Correctional Institution, Prisoners.
  1. Adam, Rahmat, and Saiful Anwar. 2021. “Kedudukan Tertanggung Dalam Asuransi Jiwa Kredit.” Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2(1): 84–94. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3567290/polling-58-masyarakat-puas-kinerja-kpk,.
  2. Adipradana, Iswahyudi. 2019. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Sebagai Pemegang Polis Asuransi Profesi.” Notaire 1(2): 249.
  3. Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. 2016. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris. Depok: Pranamedia Group.
  4. Irawan, Yuda, Uci Rahmalisa, and Ulfa Aprilia. 2019. “Sistem Database Pemasyarakatan Studi Kasus Lapas Kelas II A Pekanbaru.” Journal of Technopreneurship and Information System (JTIS).
  5. Karnovinanda, Rhapsody, and Tri Suciati. 2014. “Prevalensi Depresi Pada Narapidana Di Lembaga Permasyarakatan Anak.” faktor penyebab stres pada tenaga kesehatan dan masyarakat pada saat pandemicovid-19.
  6. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 1999. “REFORMASI HUKUM DAN PENDIDIKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA.” Perspektif.
  7. Pelle, Livia. 2012. “Peranan Etika Profesi Hukum Terhadap Upaya Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Lex Crimen.
  8. Peraturan Pemerintah Pasal 1 ayat 21 Bab. 1. 1945. Pasal 1 Ayat 21 Bab. 1 Tentang Ketentuan Umum Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
  9. Peraturan Pemerintah Pasal I ayat (2). 1945. Pasal I Ayat (2) UUD 1945 Perubahan Ketiga.
  10. Saharjo. 2006. Sistem Pemasyarakatan Indonesia. Magelang: Lembaga Pemasyaraatan.
  11. Sonata, Depri Liber. 2015. “METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM NORMATIF DAN EMPIRIS: KARAKTERISTIK KHAS DARI METODE MENELITI HUKUM.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
  12. Sudarto. 1990. Hukum Pidana I, Yayasan Sudarto. Semarang: FH UNDIP.
  13. Sujatno, Adi. 2006. Sistem Pemasyarakatan Indonesia. Magelang: Lembaga Pemasyarakatan.
  14. Vij, Sumit et al. 2019. “Power Interplay between Actors: Using Material and Ideational Resources to Shape Local Adaptation Plans of Action (LAPAs) in Nepal.” Climate Policy.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2021-09-14
Published: 2021-09-14
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: