BENTUK TANGGUNG JAWAB KONSTITUSI PEMERINTAH TERHADAP KELOMPOK PENYELENGGARA PEMUNGUTAN SUARA (KPPS) DALAM PEMILU 2019: TRAGEDI DEMOKRASI PEMILU

visi jiwa tajaswari* -  Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Anom Wahyu Asmorojati -  Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD) Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v5i1.3682

This writing aims to determine the form of Government accountability to KPPS who died in the implementation of the 2019 General Election based on Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections, and aims to determine the form of legal protection for KPPS officers assigned to the 2019 Election based on Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. The type of research used in the preparation of this paper is a normative legal research method, this research is only aimed at written regulations so that this research is closely related to libraries that require secondary data in the library. The data collection method used in the preparation of this paper is the literature study method, the data analysis carried out in the preparation of this paper is a qualitative descriptive method which aims to reveal events or facts, circumstances, phenomena, variables and circumstances that occurred during the research by presenting what actually happened. The results of this study are a form of government accountability to KPPS officers who died in the 2019 Election in the form of compensation worth 36 million rupiah, this compensation is given to the families of victims who have been left behind. This proposal regarding the nominal compensation money is proposed by the KPU and approved by the Ministry of Finance. The compensation is given directly by the Ministry of Finance to be submitted through the KPU and also BAWASLU as the party with the authority to hand over the compensation to the victim's family. Legal protection for KPPS which is assigned to hold the 2019 Election, namely, is stated in the 1945 Constitution Article 28D paragraph (1) regarding equality before the law to obtain protection without discrimination.

Supplement Files

Keywords
Government’s responsibility, Voting Organizer Groups, General Election
  1. Adam, R., & Anwar, S. (2021). Kedudukan Tertanggung dalam Asuransi Jiwa Kredit. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 84–94. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3567290/polling-58-masyarakat-puas-kinerja-kpk,
  2. Benuf, K. (2019). Harmonisasi Hukum: Pemilu Serentak Dan Ketenagakerjaan Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Kematian KPPS Tahun 2019.
  3. Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2004). Pemilihan Umum 2004 Dalam Angka Dan Gambar Peristiwa. Jakarta: Komisi Pemilihan Umum.
  4. Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2019). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pemungutan dan Perhitungan Suara di TPS Pemilu. Jakarta: Komisi Pemilihan Umum.
  5. Mundandar. (2001). Stress dan Keselamatan Kerja, Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
  6. Pandiangan, A. (2019). Kelompok Penyelenggaera Pemungutan Suara (KPPS) Pemilu 2019: Tanggungjawab dan Beban Kerja.
  7. Ruray, S. B. (2012). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Pengelolaan Dan Pelestarian Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup. Bandung: P.T Alumni.
  8. Santoso, T., & Budhiati, I. (2019). Pemilu Indonesia: Kelembagaan, pelaksanaan dan Pengawasan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  9. Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  10. Surbakti, R. K. N. (2015). Studi Tentang Desain Kelembagaan Pemilu Yang Efektif. Jakarta: Kemitraan Bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.
  11. Suwoto. (1990). Kekuasaan dan Tanggungwab Presiden. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.
  12. Yamin, M. (1959). Naskah Persiapan UUD 1945: Risalah Sidang BPUPKI/PPKI. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara RI.

Full Text: Supp. File(s):
Untitled
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (138KB)    Indexing metadata
Article Info
Submitted: 2021-03-10
Published: 2021-03-18
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 200 11
Citation :