IMPLEMENTASI PERSAMAAN HAK NARAPIDANA TERHADAP PELAYANAN KESEHATAN PADA LEMBAGA PERMASYARAKATAN PROVINSI RIAU

Deriansyah Deriansyah* -  Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia
Ardiansyah Ardiansyah -  Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia
Bagio Kadaryanto -  Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v5i1.3602

In essence, correctionalization is one of the manifestations of the formal institutionalization of the public's reaction to crime. The reaction of this society at first only focused on the element of giving suffering to lawbreakers. However, in line with the development of society, the element of giving suffering must also be balanced with humane treatment by paying attention to the human rights of lawbreakers as individual beings, as well as creatures. social. Therefore, the correctional facility must also function as a place for the rehabilitation of prisoners with a variety of coaching activities. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the equal rights of prisoners to get health services at prisons in Riau province and to analyze the obstacles and efforts in implementing the equal rights of prisoners to get health services in prisons in Riau province. The research method is sociological legal research, by identifying the legal effectiveness of the law in society which discusses the Implementation of the Equality of Prisoners to Get Health Services in Prisons in Riau Province, namely in Class II A Lapas Pekanbaru and Class II B Rokan Hulu Prison. In general, the implementation of prisoners' rights in obtaining health services in prisons in Riau Province has not been able to meet the needs of prisoners in prisons. It is hoped that the government will pay special attention to the impact arising from the overcapacity of a correctional institution. Because the excess occupants (over capacity) of a correctional institution will cause a health condition that is not good for prisoners so that it will hinder the running or ineffectiveness of the implementation of development programs in prisons. It is hoped that the Government will further improve health resources, financing, infrastructure, health service efforts and maintain environmental health in prisons and fulfill the food and drinking needs of prisoners in prisons as well as special attention to the impact arising from overpopulation. capacity) of a correctional institution so that the right to health for prisoners can be fulfilled, and human rights can be protected according to the ideals of the Indonesian people as referred to in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUDNRI).
Keywords
Prisoners, Health Services, Correctional Institutions.
  1. Adesaputra, N. (2020). Hasil Wawancara, Kamis, Tanggal 8 oktober 2020, Kepala Subseksi Bimkeswat Lapas Klas IIA Pekanbaru danWawancara dengan Kepala seksi Perawatan Lapas Klas II B Rokanhulur, tanggal 12 Oktober 2020.
  2. Anwar, S. (2021). Internalisasi Nilai Pendidikan Akhlak dalam Surat Al-Hujurat Tafsir fi ZIlalil Qur’an. JIE: Journal of Islamic Edication, 6(1), 1–12.
  3. Arafat, Y. (2005). Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945 dan Perubahannya. Jakarta: Permata Press.
  4. Dokter Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas IIA Pekanbaruu, & Tenaga Medis Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas II B Rokanhulu. (2020). Wawancara, Tanggal 8 & 12 oktober 2020,.
  5. Harahap, M. Y. (2006). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  6. Kepala Seksi Perawatan Lapas Klas II B Rokanhulur. (2020). Wawancara, Tanggal 12 Oktober 2020.
  7. Kepala Sub Bidang Pelayanan Tahanan. (2020). Wawancara, tanggal 8 oktober 2020.
  8. Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  9. N. (2020). Wawancara, Kamis Tanggal 8 oktober 2020, Narapidana Lapas Klas IIA Pekanbaru dan Lapas Klas II B Rokan huku, wawancara tanggal 12 oktober 2020.
  10. Pandjaitan, P. I., & Widiarty, W. S. (2008). Pembaharuan Pemikiran DR. Sahardjo Mengenai Pemasyarakatan Narapidana. Jakarta: Ind Hill Co.
  11. Pound, R. (2010). Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial dalam Bernard L. Tanya, Teori Hukum, Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas dan Ruang Generasi. Jakarta: Genta Publishing.
  12. Radjab, S. (2002). Dasar-Dasar Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta: PBHI.
  13. Saleh, R. (1987). Stelsel Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
  14. Salim, M. (2016). ADAT SEBAGAI BUDAYA KEARIFAN LOKAL UNTUK MEMPERKUAT EKSISTENSI ADAT KE DEPAN. Al Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan. https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v5i2.4845
  15. Sedermawanti. (2003). Good Governance. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju.
  16. Setiaji, M. L., & Ibrahim, A. (2018). KAJIAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM NEGARA THE RULE OF LAW : ANTARA HUKUM PROGRESIF DAN HUKUM POSITIF. Lex Scientia Law Review. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v2i2.27580
  17. Smith, R. K. M. (2008). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: PUSHAM UII.
  18. Sodiq, N. (2016). MEMBANGUN POLITIK HUKUM INDONESIA BERCORAK RESPONSIF PERSPEKTIF IUS CONSTITUENDUM. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal). https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2016.v05.i02.p02
  19. Sonarso, S. (2004). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Kajian Sosiologis. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  20. Suwarto. (2012). Individualisasi Pemidanaan. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Pres.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2021-01-29
Published: 2021-01-31
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 101 40
Citation :