PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK DESAIN INDUSTRI SEPATU TERHADAP IMITASI (Studi Perbandingan dengan Amerika Serikat)

Muhammad Faizal Akbar Laksmana* -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v5i2.3575

The development of the shoe industry in Indonesia today raises new problems where the similarity of shoe designs between several brands is a new problem that arises. The shoe industry design rights holders which should be highly protected have not fully received strong legal protection and there are no regulations that discuss in detail about design imitation. This writing uses a comparative method, namely the author compares with the United States that has protected industrial design rights holders since 1989 and has proven successful in protecting industrial design rights holders, therefore this comparison is important so that regulations on industrial design rights in Indonesia can benefit rights holders. 

Keywords
Industrial Design Rights, Intelectual Property Rights, Imitation of the Design
  1. Abimayu, Y., & Srinindiati, D. (2020). SEJARAH TERBENTUKNYA KEPULAUAN BANGKA BELITUNG (PANGKAL PINANG) SEBAGAI SUMBER PEMBELARAN SEJARAH. Kalpataru: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Pembelajaran Sejarah. https://doi.org/10.31851/kalpataru.v5i2.4111
  2. Adam, R., & Anwar, S. (2021). Kedudukan Tertanggung dalam Asuransi Jiwa Kredit. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 84–94.
  3. Ćeranić-Perišić, J. (2020). Evolution of case law regarding the interpretation of the secondary liability standard in U.S. trademark law. Pravo i Privreda. https://doi.org/10.5937/pip2003141c
  4. Gashi, L., Sandberg, S., & Pedersen, W. (2021). Making “bad trips” good: How users of psychedelics narratively transform challenging trips into valuable experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102997
  5. Hanley, L. (2020). Lockdown has laid bare Britain’s class divide. The Guardian.
  6. Lu, Y. (2016). The Conjunction and Disjunction Fallacies: Explanations of the Linda Problem by the Equate-to-Differentiate Model. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9314-6
  7. Mc Carthey, S., & Raphael, T. (1993). Integração pedagógica da leitura e escritura três abordagens e suas respectivas implicações na alfabetização. Letras de Hoje.
  8. Monseau, S. (2011a). European Design Rights: A Model for the Protection of All Designers from Piracy. American Business Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2010.01111.x
  9. Monseau, S. (2011b). The Challenges of Protecting Industrial Design in the Global Economy. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  10. Moretti, F. (2001). Planet Hollywood. New Left Review.
  11. Rifan, M., & Rahmawati, L. (2020). PEMBAHARUAN UU DESAIN INDUSTRI: TANTANGAN MELINDUNGI USER INTERFACE DAN KOMPARASI UNSUR AESTHETIC IMPRESSION. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i2.438
  12. Ryu, J. S. (2009). Business Strategies in Competitive Markets : Coach ’ s Success Story in Japan. Forum American Bar Association.
  13. Saputra, D. I. S., Indartono, K., Handani, S. W., & Hermawan, H. (2020). Program Pengembangan Kewirausahaan Industri Kreatif di STMIK AMIKOM Purwokerto. JPPM (Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat). https://doi.org/10.30595/jppm.v0i0.3145
  14. Schikl, L. (2013). Protection of Industrial Design in the United States and in the EU: Different Concepts or Different Labels. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 16(1), 15–38.
  15. Sri Mujiarti Ulfah. (2021). MENCERMATI ARAH PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA. Journal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Pemerintahan. https://doi.org/10.37304/jispar.v1i2.346

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2021-01-25
Published: 2021-09-05
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: