BUSINESS COMPETITION IN IMPLEMENTATION GOVERNMENT TENDER

Albert Ben Affendy* -  Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia
Arbina Florenchia -  Hukum Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia
Dinda Evita -  Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia
Ella Lirpa Simaremare -  Universitas Prima Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v4i2.2896

The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) has the authority to examine and decide on alleged violations of business competition in tenders under Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices. The results of the study of Case Verdict Number: 34 / KPPU-L / 2009 are that there are several facts that business actors have violated Article 22 of Law Number 5 of 1999 that fulfills elements of conspiracy, the form of conspiracy is vertical collusion and conspiracy horizontal. In Case Decision Number 34 / KPPU-L / 2009 it is shown that a violation of business competition has Elements that can determine that there is an unfair business practice, in this case it is stated that Reported I, Reported II, Reported III, Reported IV, Reported V, Reported VI was proven to have been legally and convinced to have carried out a tender conspiracy. The formulation of the problem in the research is an analysis of the authority of the KPPU and the elements of a tender conspiracy. The type of research that was used in this journal were the Normative Research Type, and the data collection technique used is the literature study

Keywords
KPPU's Authority, Tender Collusion, Elements of Collusion
  1. E. DAFTAR RUJUKAN
  2. Peraturan Perundang-Undang :
  3. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.
  4. Buku :
  5. Rokan, Mustafa Kamal. 2017. Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  6. Hermansyah. 2008. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  7. Sirait, Ningrum Natasya. 2011. Hukum Persaingan Di Indonesia. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa .
  8. Jurnal Ilmiah:
  9. Junaidi, Ahmad. 2012. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha . Edisi 7 .
  10. Anggraini Anna Maria Tri. 2009. Implementasi Perluasan Istilah Tender dalam Pasal 22 UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Edisi 2.
  11. Asmah . 2017. Penerapan Sanksi Denda Terhadap Kasus Persekongkolan Tender Jalan Nasional , Naskah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sawerigading Makassar.
  12. Zihaningrum, Apectriyas. 2016. Penegakan Hukum Persekongkolan Tender Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Privat Law Vol. IV No 1.
  13. Sembiring, Daniel Jusuf Said. 2016. Persekongkolan Tender Secara Vertikal Dan Gabungan Horizontal Dan Vertikal Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Tahun 2013 Sampai Tahun 2014. Universitas ATMA Jaya Yogyakarta.
  14. Karya Ilmiah:
  15. Muttaqin, Ungki Miftahul. 2009. Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Perspektif Hukum Islam. Skripsi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga. Yogyakarta.
  16. Putusan Pengadilan:
  17. Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Perkara Nomor: 34/KPPU-L/2009

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2020-08-07
Published: 2020-09-10
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 68 33
Citation :