AN OVERVIEW OF THE JUDICIARY AGAINST THE MARKETING AUTHORIZATION WHICH WAS REPEALED OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS BRAND PI KANG SHUANG IN SAMARINDA BASED ON LAW NO. 36 OF 2009 ON HEALTH

Bella Brigitta* -  Universitas Airlangga Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI : 10.24269/ls.v2i2.1243

In traditional medical products brands Pi Kang Shuang, experiencing problems with marketing authorization that are not listed on the traditional medical products Pi Kang Shuang brands, there are two problems in this thesis any reason What are the factors still circulating products not my traditional medical Pi Kang Shuang brands do not have a marketing authorization in Samarinda and how control center taken for the Food and Drug Administration's efforts (BBPOM) on the circulation and trafficking in conventional drugs that have not been recorded in the city of Samarinda. The purpose of this study was to determine the cause of traditional medicines that were not registered in the city of Samarinda trading and identify enforcement conducted by the Food and Drug Administration Center (BBPOM) in Samarinda for violating trading traditional medicines that are not registered and do not have BPOM number in the city of Samarinda. Writing method that I use is an experimental research done by direct observation of spaciousness for data collection, processing and analysis of law data on enforcement brand traditional medicinal Pi Kang Shuang products who do not have marketing authorization, which is where the study's authors are still trading products exist traditional medical Pi Kang Shuang brands. The concept of the book is provided to improve the supervision of the Centre for Food and Drug Control, provide guidance on traditional medicine which has a legitimacy that would come at a time when there is no longer in traditional medicine has not traded for marketing authorization

Keywords
Causes, Law Enforcement, Traditional Medicine
  1. Iip Jauhar Latifah, 2013, Analisa Yuridis Tentang Peredaran Jamu Cap “Akar Dewa” Di Kkota Samarinda Yang Mengandung Bahan Kimia Obat ( Menurut Undang-Undang Kesehatan Nomor 36 Tahun 2009). Skripsi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda
  2. Muhamad, Abdul Kadir, 2004, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung
  3. Nasution, Az, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Suatu Pengatar, Diabit Media, Jakarta, 2001
  4. Nurhayati, Yulia, 2012, Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Dengan Beredarnya Jamu Yang Mengandung Bahan Kimia Obat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Skripsi Fakultas hukum, Universitas Langlang Buana, Bandung
  5. P. De haan, dkk dalam Philipus M. Hadjon, “Penegakan Hukum Administrasi”, Yuridika, No. 1 Tahun XI, Januari-Pebruari 1996
  6. Raharjo, Soetjipto, Rangkuman Intisari ilmu Hukum dalam Riduan Syahrani
  7. Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Kepala Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Nomor HK.00.05.41.1384 Tahun 2005 tentang Kriteria dan Tata Laksana Pendaftaran Obat Tradisional, Obat Herbal Terstandar, dan Fitofamarka
  8. Republik Indonesia, Undang-undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.
  9. Republik Indonesia, Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
  10. Siagian P, Sondang, 2007, Fungsi-fungsi manajerial, PT. Bumi Askara, Jakarta.
  11. Soerjono Soekanto dalam Soerjono Soekanto, Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Rajawali pers, Jakarta
  12. Sugiono, Bambang 1998, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta,
  13. Titik Triwulan Tutik, 2006, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Prestasi Pustakaraya, jakarta,
  14. Zaeni, Ahsyandie, 2012, Hukum Bisinis Prinsip Dan Pelaksanaannya DI Indonesia, Penerbit PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2018-10-02
Published: 2018-10-23
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 58 227
Citation :